Private detective Minsk - SCAM in Belarusian. http://detective.ucoz.ru/

[Адвокат]

Again you, Alexander, contradict yourself.
I quote your message published on the page: viewtopic.php? f = 14 & t = 4060 & start = 60

Such people as Andrei still need to be looked for, he has never “thrown anyone”, he is still young, hasty, ambitious and not too judicious, he has not served in the authorities, so he can’t make all orders, although he even tries to finish and close all the commotion all the questions that he is accused of. I’m sure of this man, but he’s just not a performer, he is good at taking orders, but not fulfilling them . Everyone should have a role.

 

[магда]

Aleksandrovich returned the money to all debtors.

Lying.
You, Alexander, either knowingly lie, or your friend Andrei is deceiving you too.

We have a civil court in Belarus, and if a person believes that they should return the money, he should approach from the legal side.

In Belarus (by the way, it would not hurt to know how to spell the name of your republic!) There are a lot of things. And a lot of things are not. For example, as far as I know, the services of a private detective are not.

And I think that this is a fake customer.

You, personally, can think what you want.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

And I think that this is a fake customer.

You, personally, can think what you want.

Dear Magda, A. Kozhevnikov, a friend and defender of Aleksandrovich, registered at the forum as a private detective, so you can go to his personal page and chat.

 

[магда]

Dear Magda, A. Kozhevnikov, a friend and defender of Aleksandrovich, registered at the forum as a private detective, so you can go to his personal page and chat.

What should I talk about with him on his page? There he is a registered “private investigator” and his colleagues cheerfully greet him.
I, personally, did NOT contact him for the provision of services. I did not give him money. And I didn’t see him in the eyes.
HERE I speak with Alexander only because it is MY topic and he accuses me of “nothingness” and of lies.

I am not a seer. It only seems to me that after some time, he will write that he no longer cooperates with the “honest” friend Andrei.
Wait and see.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

What should I talk about with him on his page? There he is a registered “private investigator” and his colleagues cheerfully greet him.
I, personally, did NOT contact him for the provision of services. I did not give him money. And I didn’t see him in the eyes.
HERE I speak with Alexander only because it is MY topic and he accuses me of “nothingness” and of lies.

I am not a seer. It only seems to me that after some time, he will write that he no longer cooperates with the “honest” friend Andrei.
Wait and see.

I’m not going to greet him, and for good reason,
and I’m having a conversation with him (in PM) and I think she will soon get a resonance at the forum, especially Matushkina Andrey, I informed.

 

[магда]

Alexander.
1) If you decide to intercede for Andrei, please explain what prevented him from during the nearly 2 months during which our forum was discussing his "activities" to meet with the customer and remove doubts about his decency.
2) If you consider him your friend, help a friend return the money to the customer for an unproven service. Maybe your friend just does not have time to get to the customer? : o

Not certainly in that way. "The hero of the topic" was announced. He swore he would return the money. Only all the time transfers the date of the meeting))) Assigns time and just does not come. Then he swears again, and again does not come. Can not get to me: lol:

But what you are right about is that I didn’t conclude a written contract with Andrey.
Attempts to figure out "legally", as Alexander suggests, were. The truth is not mine. There were people with contracts who wrote statements to the police. And then Andrew quickly found the money to close the question.

And I’m not quite clear about Alexander’s moaning about the fact that someone is hindering Andrei from working. Maybe, of course, I don’t know something and look at the problem narrowly - only for my part. But, in my opinion, only his shamelessness and arrogance interferes with normal work. He's just a petty swindler. And in appearance - you will not say. A humble, apologetic young man. Therefore, I believed him.

PS I don’t know Alexander either from the good or the bad side, but if a person writes a post on page 7, you quote his words verbatim, and on page 8 this person accuses you of “inventing” - what does this mean? Or a person writes without thinking, or does not want to face the truth.

 

[Частный детектив. Дмитрий Викторчик. Беларусь. Мин]

After this incident, Dmitry Viktorchik turned out to be dishonest (this is my opinion and some operational information, a source from the authorities). Coincidentally, someone wrote an agent to their own security service (CSS). co. about my cooperation with the authorities. In Minsk and Belarus somebody disposes private detectives and does not give the opportunity to work. Clear premier - Alexandrovich, he was handed over by one of the detectives (I cannot say from ethics) but this is reliable and honest information that I learned from directly from friends from EC <?. Александровичу просто do not give work (watch, interrupt clints and if you ask this question to this person and he lies, I can provide evidence.

But this is Mr. Kozhevnikov - direct slander! And you have to give an explanation about this.

And learn, finally, to write without grammatical errors, otherwise it becomes a shame for the country.

 

[ДНК]

However ... Dmitry is right that these are direct accusations .... and words must be answered. I propose to transfer the topic to a semi-private and "parse" between your own. There is no need to put out a squabble for public hearing (all-seeing), we can only endure the "result of disassembly."
Alexander Kozhevnikov - you went in, registered, you were greeted with dignity and greeted .... you put forward claims of dishonesty to one of our comrades ... I ask you to explain, if there is an invoice - lay it out.
Request to the moderators - create a separate branch in the semi-private area to discuss this issue ....

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Alexander Kozhevnikov does not have access to the floor privat, Andrew, too. So the topic will be here so far.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Why don’t you write that there are ten times more fulfilled orders, including those related to suicide, search, and other areas, 10% of which people complain , I'm sure not satisfied customers have enough for every "detective". The question for Andrei (Aleksandrovich, Sergei, as you call him) is, that a person simply missed something, or maybe he was too lazy to do something, or there was no way to do it, for lack of time or other problems.

This is THAT FREQUENTLY, VERY FREQUENTLY REASONS TO OUR WORK ...... It is this approach that allows those who wish to pour DIRT ON ALL OF US .... 10% of those who come under complaints are SMALL ???? !!!!! ! .......