polygraph specialist

[dron]

I understand that everything new seems completely crazy. But listen to my point of view on this profile. As I understand it, Igor did not even bother to people who wrote the questionnaire to explain the requirements for filling it out. So they got unsuitable material for research. And the short phrases “Yes” and “No” are not the text that the program analyzes. One of the conditions for the correct operation of the program, a person, when writing a text, should experience emotions. These emotions are attached to a specific phrase (or sentence). It’s easier to lie by saying a short yes or no. Following the instructions, we do not allow the subject to do this in writing - he must thereby appear. Exactly the same indignation will be among people who write an explanation and at the same time break it with control topics. And they don’t write anything nice, realizing that we and people are not playing games!
It was possible to simplify the questionnaire by creating sparing conditions for the subject, but I don’t know how these phrases will be perceived later by the subjects (will they cause any emotions or will a person fill them without any emotions at all, how he fills his passport details), and so the questions questionnaires are tested on the experience of a contact polygraph and are absolutely working in terms of the fact that they really cause emotions.
Chekhord with numbering is also not essential. the zero question or the one indicated by the “K” symbol is service notes, of course look exotic for the uninitiated, but it’s easier for me to navigate the structure of the test.
Conserving work under something, do you really not encounter detectives? At the very beginning, Igor set the task of checking one person. And it sends profiles to 4 people. Somehow one does not fit with the other. I realized that the legend is being thrown in, the whole team is writing questionnaires, and only that one we needed was checked initially. Or is it done in Ukraine somehow differently? : D
There is a saying: "The road will be overpowered by the going." Let's take steps together, maybe at the beginning the drinks are not very successful, but they are certainly very necessary.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

0. Do you indicate the name, surname and date of birth, passport data do they correspond to reality?

Igor, you need something like this! : lol:

My surname, name and patronymic were given to me at birth by my parents back in 1971. At the age of 16, these data were entered in the passport of a citizen of the USSR. They were recorded according to the "Birth Certificate" and to this day have not changed. : lol:

: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol: Super !!!! one of the options is to "overpower" the road )) )
Andrey (Drone)! Object No. 2- being checked ..... But- what will change ??? ..... Excuse me for "Ukrainian" provincialism, but let someone else experiment, who wants to hang around for dozens of unambiguous questions for weeks and listen abstruse-obviously-incomprehensible instructions (I posted almost all the correspondence)

But how differently I have not yet come up with! : lol:

 

[Евгений СБ]

Igor, my personal opinion.
It is better to invite a polygraph examiner and work out people for involvement through a polygraph. What to do with their verification through such a dubious procedure. British scientists may be good in their theories. But in reality, the simpler the more reliable.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Igor, my personal opinion.
It is better to invite a polygraph examiner and work out people for involvement through a polygraph. What to do with their verification through such a dubious procedure. British scientists may be good in their theories. But in reality, the simpler the more reliable.

I agree to 150%, Eugene .... The only trouble is that this "doubtfulness" also costs money .... Then, if there is dissatisfaction, the answer is ready: you didn’t figure it out and this is your difficulty .... It hurts the picture is familiar ...

 

[Евгений СБ]

Igor, my personal opinion.
It is better to invite a polygraph examiner and work out people for involvement through a polygraph. What to do with their verification through such a dubious procedure. British scientists may be good in their theories. But in reality, the simpler the more reliable.

I agree to 150%, Eugene .... The only trouble is that this "doubtfulness" also costs money .... Then, if there is dissatisfaction, the answer is ready: you didn’t figure it out and this is your difficulty .... It hurts the picture is familiar ...

I agree. It’s very convenient to move off the topic and put the blame on a comma not put there. It all hurts like a divorce. And without sucker - life is bad. There is such a saying. : lol:

 

[dron]

Igor wrote "I agree to 150%, Eugene .... The only trouble is that this" doubtfulness "also costs money .... Then, if there is dissatisfaction, the answer is ready: you did not figure it out and these are your difficulties ... . Painfully familiar picture ... "
Excuse me, I don’t understand, but that a familiar polygraph examiner will not ask you for research? All for free will do?
The technology is no more dubious than a traditional polygraph, but it has advantages that I wrote about. How, for example, will a polygraph examiner check a client if he is sick or even refuses to sign a document on voluntary participation in a polygraph survey, referring to the fact that such checks are humiliating for him?
The technology of lie detection in handwritten text is not British, but Russian. : D
About subject "number 1" - it is possible that way, but is it necessary, if the program provides for the introduction of a surname, and not something else.
Just seriousness in the intention to do everything right is right, apparently Igor did not have enough. Without seeing the result, how can you rant about it? What is it that all clients who always had a "snout in the cannon" always dutifully and meekly ate what they were presented with or incriminated after a polygraph? Nonsense. There may be a claim. And to answer honestly to them, without throwing a customer, is the level of trust between them. And the client is under "number one", is this not an indicator of the level of trust?

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

:? As the colleague’s motto says “Less words, more deeds” ... something is the other way around ... there’s a lot of spray, but the swimmer is in place :?

 

[dron]

What can I say, we stopped with Igor halfway. Unfortunately, my words could not convince him to do everything right. So far, I have in my hands available material unsuitable for research. That's all.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

What has been demonstrated here by colleagues does not inspire confidence.
Applied use of the technique of "remote use of the polygraph" is doubtful, for now, anyway.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

What can I say, we stopped with Igor halfway. Unfortunately, my words could not convince him to do everything right. So far, I have in my hands available material unsuitable for research. That's all.

You can destroy them or leave as a memory of the "stupid Ukrainian detectives" who after 2-3 weeks of fruitless efforts did not understand the unique benefits of a dozen clever questions ......