polygraph specialist

[dron]

Dear Help and Uri, you remind me of my boss (for service in the Ministry of Internal Affairs). Remember that he demanded from his subordinates that they work for free, that is, free then. If he was going for something, spending some money to buy, then it was a holiday for our unit! That in the end, but in the end everyone worked on old computers, took advantage of the fact that other units were thrown out or written off as unnecessary. But there was a lot of farce about spending budget funds !!!!
I wish you to reconsider your position regarding the freebie. Now the time is different already. I very much doubt that local polygraph examiners you know will do this for free. Everyone wants to eat! : D The cost of using Caligrah is quite comparable in similar studies on a contact polygraph, and Caligrah has much more opportunities, if you want You can verify this yourself by working with me.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Dear Help and Uri, you remind me of my boss (for service in the Ministry of Internal Affairs). Remember that he demanded from his subordinates that they work for free, that is, free then. If he was going for something, spending some money to buy, then it was a holiday for our unit! That in the end, but in the end everyone worked on old computers, took advantage of the fact that other units were thrown out or written off as unnecessary. But there was a lot of farce about spending budget funds !!!!
I wish you to reconsider your position regarding the freebie. Now the time is different already. I very much doubt that local polygraph examiners you know will do this for free. Everyone wants to eat! : D The cost of using Caligrah is quite comparable in similar studies on a contact polygraph, and Caligrah has much more opportunities, if you want You can verify this yourself by working with me.

There wasn’t a word about the freebie ))) Freebie, Andrei, that the METHOD FOR MONEY IS OFFERED .... WITH THIS METHOD = "0" .... This was understood by the majority of COLLEAGUES ..... On this I suggest ADVERTISING PROMOTION cease ......

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

About a freebie was not a word )))

I am not a freeloader, I am a partner!

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Stunned ... launched an advertising campaign here as many as 14 pages ...
It’s just that all the soooo stupid were around and their (our) not-so-distant mind cannot perceive such a cool-ingenious technique ... apparently we have not grown to the level of the drone specialist-polygraph examiner-caligraphologist-Marketer ...: cry:

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

About a freebie was not a word )))

I am not a freeloader, I am a partner!

: lol:

 

[dron]

Help and Uri messed up everything again, no technique proposed , but a service. I do not sell a technique! I told here partially of methodological techniques so that a potential customer could use it (service) to solve their own (production) problems. The remark on account of its nullity, I will attribute only to the fact that a person could not see and understand the benefit for himself. But this is only his subjective opinion, not confirmed by anything. I remind all readers that it was Help and Uri who did not control how the employees fill out the questionnaires and therefore received manuscripts that were unacceptable for analysis. And here is the technique? The uniqueness of the technique is that an ordinary document written on paper can be analyzed for lies. Moreover, all this can be done from a distance. It used to be considered fiction. And what about the rules, they are everywhere, where there is a scientifically based decision or method. And to lower their value means to destroy the methodology. And as a result, no one gets incomprehensible results.

The fact that Help and Uri is right is that for a certain advertising campaign, writing is enough. The one who wanted to hear me . With those who wish to personally use the service, I will communicate further through the PM.

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

not a technique is offered, but a service.

- the essence of the matter does not change from this play on words and clarification - everyone perfectly understood everything and so ... from a simple and stupidly unshakable mind ...

I told here partially of methodological techniques so that a potential customer could use it (service) to solve their own (production) problems.

- You are recruiting clients (customers) in PND chtoli ?! And how many listened to all this nonsense to the horse and ordered a service? I think not, otherwise this promotion would not have happened ...

The remark on account of its nullity, I will attribute only to the fact that a person could not see and understand the benefit for himself.

- I didn’t see any benefit either for Help, neither for myself, nor for CUSTOMERS, but the benefits for DRON are clearly visible ...

The uniqueness of the technique is that an ordinary document written on paper can be analyzed for lies. Moreover, all this can be done from a distance. It used to be considered fiction. And what about the rules, they are everywhere, where there is a scientifically based decision or method. And to lower their value means to destroy the methodology. And as a result, no one gets incomprehensible results.

- stop raving ... I read your questionnaire and showed it to an experienced polygraph examiner and psychologist-doctor of science ... everyone agreed that this is nonsense and even the questionnaire itself was originally built weakly and not professionally, the only benefit from this is the benefit of providing the service side, i.e. profit...
You still wrote somewhere that it’s all serious because it’s patented ... so it’s also for suckers ... you can even patent a donut hole - no joke! ... but the donut will not become a croissant ...

 

[dron]

Dear State Councilor, use only trusted sources of information, a mythical doctor of sciences, and even more so the blurry "we" I personally do not deserve trust. In order to expose someone or make anti-advertising, you must at least be in the topic of conversation. Have you ever seen a polygraph in your eyes, and not on TV? In more detail, I wrote you in a personal advise you to follow my example.

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Dear State Councilor, use only trusted sources of information, a mythical doctor of sciences, and even more so the blurry "we" I personally do not deserve trust. In order to expose someone or make anti-advertising, you must at least be in the topic of conversation. Have you ever seen a polygraph in your eyes, and not on TV? In more detail, I wrote you in a personal advise you to follow my example.

I will answer your grievances in this thread, and not in PM.

Here is what you sent me:

= 1. You have made a number of comments to me and I think you should apologize for such harsh assessments, including my mental state. Be a worthy opponent, be able to argue, since you yourself have chosen this position.

2. The one whom you so passionately defend the Help and Uri. He is well versed in what is a service and what is a technique. I got the impression why he started a discussion after he said: "All the work is finished, we won’t redo anything else." Maybe it is deceptive, but maybe not. There are such cunning specialists who are ready to find out more from third parties and to buy the technique themselves and work with it. And that’s why this whole performance was played out. I was not going to disclose my developments with this program, but how can I not do this if I need to talk about the service? One pulls the other.

3. Profit. I don’t understand what bothers you. Yes, I set an acceptable price for the service, so that not only I get money from you for work, but so that you can solve your (production) problems and have more profit from this than before, without working with me. Because new opportunities give new financial horizons. Help and Uri asked me how can I apply it, why should I tell him about this, a person should have a fantasy, in order to put something new into practice. Here you are not a beginner on the forum, tell me there was at least one project to help a detective, not only to break through an address or telephone, but more global? And for this work, the detectives did not pay among themselves, but did it only for friendly reasons? If you know, tell me, maybe this is how it should be done here. We will build communism.

4. The questionnaire is weak, the technique does not work. Tell me, if this is true, do you think? Would I go for it if, after the first remote survey, the customer would get a result that would not fundamentally suit him. That is, with such a questionnaire, I would not be able to identify a lie, and the results were similar to those that some receive, guessing on the coffee grounds. Surely, after that there would be anti-advertising to which people listened. Is this how business will fit, young man?

5. Experienced polygraph examiner, psychologist, doctor of sciences. Can his name be voiced? How can this experienced polygraph examiner judge the work and the results when it is not completed to the end? Moreover, for sure this friend of yours probably has no idea about the work of the Caligraph. There are specifics, there are differences that I do not cover on the pages of the forum - why do people who are far from this work know this. As for the questionnaire itself, I will tell you a secret - the work of A. Soshnikov, A. Pelenitsin was taken as the basis, the questions of Matte, Feldman and others are included. If the respected Doctor of Sciences did not hear these names anywhere, then he is not a polygraph examiner at all, a rogue who lot. Over the long years of work, I brought my work using the polygraph, and its other anologues to the height of judicial evidence (the results of which you can see on this forum), and what does your esteemed friend boast of (maybe he doesn’t exist at all?).

6. The work of the detective is complex and diverse. Vryatli who knows what will do tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. The "old-fashioned methods" that you all know about sometimes work poorly. The Caligraf technique is really new and there is not even a single opinion among polygraph examiners about it. What can we say about detectives? But like everything new, it makes its way with difficulty. I spent on the development and implementation of various techniques and methods, the years of my life, except for direct expenses on education. Now, having this baggage, I’m ready to use it all for a common cause. I remind those who listen to the advice of amateurs can sit and not change anything in their life and their work. Those who want to change at least part of their usual work will listen to the advice of professionals, try to take their own steps with them. =

1. Did I speak out somewhere Your crazy. condition ?!

2. Generally no comment .....

3. Many issues are resolved and resolved as each other , without financial obligations. And this is not communism - this is Friendship!

4. = Is this how business will go, young man? = - here we disagree on a coordinated basis ... everything is written in my signature ... for me and for many of my colleagues, a search is not a business, but a favorite business that generates income, but we do it primarily because we cannot live without a search. .... and finances are a pleasant component for feeding the family.

5. Not him, but them. I called the polygraph examiner and psychologist separately - these are two different people. I will not name my surnames; this is an ethical question regarding my attitude to them, since I voiced their opinions before. You are certainly young in your plan, the fact that you love your profession so much is great! I especially liked this one:
= I brought my work using a polygraph, and its other anologues to the height of judicial evidence = : o:? - the polygraph was not recognized before you in court ... no, my acquaintance polygraph examiner cannot boast of such achievements, so he served until his retirement at the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, he made numerous breakthroughs in printing during his service, and in retirement he developed his own contact polygraph system ... where to ...

6. Again without comment ...

Have you ever seen a polygraph in your eyes, and not on TV? In more detail, I wrote you in a personal advise you to follow my example.

No, I heard about the polygraph only on the radio: oops: And please give advice to your clients, or when they ask for advice.

ps: forgive the maaalenky little man, if he offended such a great scientist-businessman: oops:

 

[dron]

There is no surname again, doctor of mysticism, a fiction, as one would expect (are breakthroughs in polygraphology interesting?), About a private polygraph — it is generally without comment — now people almost every year invent a bicycle (polygraph), but from the fact that these inventions do not get any better. And in fact, these polygraphs turn out to be children's toys with one channel of information retrieval. But that's not the point, the fact is that it simply does not exist . And ethics is an excuse. I am not shy to name the names of my polygraph examiners.

“Search is not a business, but a way of life” - and why there are no free services on your site. So they would write: "for a good person I’m ready to work for free !!!" or "I don’t need money" or "I work for what God will give." You can come up with a bunch of options. And if that didn’t work out, what did I blame for free! : D

We really do not agree on this issue. I believe that every work should be worthy of being paid. If a detective or a polygraph examiner does not have financial security, then what kind of specialist is he? How can you get his job done if he can be outbid in an instant and then he will be forced to choose between duty, honor and financial disorder.

I don’t know how you are doing there, (Crimea-Moscow). In the Orenburg region (not in the country), an examination using a polygraph performed by me for the first time became evidence in court. It really is.
I am not a scientist or a businessman, and you are not a small person, you do not follow your speech. I corrected you, why further explain?