LEGAL LIMITATION? INFINITE LAWLESSNESS?

[Евгений СБ]

Re: LEGAL LIMITATION? ������������������

In general, I think that Utkin was hit by a toad, but Shatov did not pay for the office corner, and that he burned the negligent Antipenko. Bodyagin, who hired Antipenko, was angry at Shatov, but Shatov did not warn him that Antipenko was negligent in stealing from Bodyagin too. At the same time, Bodyagin was very closely connected with the head of the licensing service, since he apparently worked in private security business and overnight lost all the guards who bought licenses. Antipenko, too, on Shatov’s “initiative”, lost his license for private security activities ист pistol ’work. It’s just not clear why Shatov needed a toy pistol, since no other BH weapons were required.

Andrey, you can break your eyes to understand the meaning of your letter.
From what I understood, it seemed like that Maybe Utkin was not happy that Shatov did not pay the rent. So he himself, following from what was written, invited him. And even more so than the non-payer one can always be “asked” to retire peacefully.
I agree that the gun could be a toy. As a black hole gun is not supposed to, but it could well be just traumatic, personal.
As an option, that Bodyagin or Antipenko has access to the former head of the license. Which could well remain an interest in this area. Again, it is not clear whether the signatures on the false identities were his, or fake. In any case (even if not him, then in the case he was definitely “pulled”), he could well become embittered with our colleague.
The ball here can be unraveled for a long time.
It's easier to do ALIBI.

 

[Kuznecov.Igorj]

Hello everybody ? You may not agree with a comrade from Kurgan, but he writes sensibly and should be heeded. Stop, listen and look around - like death. And in this case, the best method of defense is attack, using all possible and unapproachable (not even allowed) defense methods with documentation. I believe that operas should not be taught, if not a vowel, translated into a vowel. Then your Shatov will be able to run into one, then another and further down the list, to prove his innocence in an alleged crime. I do not exclude the possibility of a more severe impact. Watch a movie, I hope. And do not forget (for those who still remember) the order of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Army General N. A. Shchelokov () to use in his work everything that our writers and directors write and put in books and movies). Only do not lose your head. Of course, I’m not specific, because after all, Shatov specifically will not tell anyone anything. You need to have a head on your shoulders and calculate your moves many steps forward. And yet, without breaking the law, attack, attack and attack again, proving each time his innocence more and more. Igor - Riga.

 

[Anonymous]

Good day! As I currently understand this situation. 1. The former head of the OHRR, Martynenko, took advantage of the situation when he was looking for ways to squeeze me and force me to quit working against him, and through his daughter Kolupaeva, an employee of the K-th prosecutor’s office, I went to the prosecutor of the U-rayon, who opened a criminal case six months later. 2. I have self-defense weapons, some of which are currently seized for identification. 3. Currently, I act as advised Karpovich Dmitry Nikolaevich and Kuznetsov Igor . I have 3 witnesses in my alibi, 2 of whom have already been interrogated. 4. According to Art. 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation there is no group, and therefore Utkin, in any case, will only be a witness. 5. I do not know the alleged prosecution witness, they are hiding him. I generally assume that it does not exist, they are just trying to get a "show off". If he still exists, then it is advisable for me to find out his data and his testimony before the court to prove that he is perjury, since there is such an experience. 6. The bearing of cell phones gives only the base station and azimuth, but it is impossible (at least in police cases) to determine the exact location of a person.
Unfortunately, I could not read the statement Andrey Prokopiev. . Sincerely, Shatov.

 

[Евгений СБ]

Good day! As I currently understand this situation. 1. The former head of the OHRR, Martynenko, took advantage of the situation when he was looking for ways to squeeze me and force me to quit working against him, and through his daughter Kolupaeva, an employee of the K-th prosecutor’s office, I went to the prosecutor of the U-rayon, who opened a criminal case six months later. 2. I have self-defense weapons, some of which are currently seized for identification. 3. Currently, I act as advised Karpovich Dmitry Nikolaevich and Kuznetsov Igor . I have 3 witnesses in my alibi, 2 of whom have already been interrogated. 4. According to Art. 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation there is no group, and therefore Utkin, in any case, will only be a witness. 5. I do not know the alleged prosecution witness, they are hiding him. I generally assume that it does not exist, they are just trying to get a "show off". If he still exists, then it is advisable for me to find out his data and his testimony before the court to prove that he is perjury, since there is such an experience. 6. The bearing of cell phones gives only the base station and azimuth, but it is impossible (at least in police cases) to determine the exact location of a person.
Unfortunately, I could not read the statement Andrey Prokopiev. . Sincerely, Shatov.

Honestly, the situation is not entirely clear. If even at that time the acting, and at present the Former Head of WRRR Martynenko signed the certificates, it is not clear what can be presented to him. He put signatures on the basis of the attached documents, which stated that people had been trained in such and such an educational institution. So, the director must be responsible for these acts. the company that allegedly provided training. What does Martynenko have to do with it? Unless he is the organizer of this whole scheme. So in any case, having pressed the above general director, he should choose: either go by a "steam locomotive", or bring everything down to the organizer. And in this case, to prove the Organizer’s involvement in the events is extremely problematic, without documentary evidence. And in this case, Martynenko first of all has a “tooth” for this director. After all, he “surrenders” it.
If the prosecution witness exists, then his data will be available only after the completion of the investigation, when it will be possible to get acquainted with all the materials of the case. Or during a confrontation, if there is disagreement in the testimony of the parties.
It is puzzling to ignore the bearing of the phones. They give a reference to the nearest station and azimuth. And you do not need to be seven spans in the forehead in order not to compare these data and determine that people were in different places. Unless in this settlement there are only three towers.
In general, I agree that the best way of defense is attack. You can’t sit back and wait!

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

In MTS, as far as I have information, a simple technical billing done by techies gives an error in coordinates of 300 meters maximum. The billing information requested by the authorities is an error of 3-5 meters.
I don’t think that TTX equipment varies greatly in other operating companies.

 

[Частный детектив Краснослободцев Дмитрий Николаеви]

In addition to collecting information providing an alibi, I would advise Mr. Shatov to write complaints to the General Prosecutor's Office and the Investigative Committee (taking into account their fuss more importantly), and also to Mr. Zhirinovsky V.V. on such “unlimited” cases are in demand among those under investigation and It would also be nice to declare a petition for detailing the calls of "customers" and "epaulettes" - I won’t be surprised if they know not only each other’s mobile numbers, but also home. Of course, false witnesses will refuse the polygraph, but I hope in the future for internal conviction available honest people can affect.
It is strange that on the testimony of false witnesses, drug trafficking was not charged.

 

[Евгений СБ]

In MTS, as far as I have information, a simple technical billing done by techies gives an error in coordinates of 300 meters maximum. The billing information requested by the authorities is an error of 3-5 meters.
I don’t think that TTX equipment varies greatly in other operating companies.

I agree with Vadim.
In addition, you can simply order a printout of all the phones that worked in the right square during X, without making billing on three phones.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

We are waiting for Shatov.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Hello! I personally know Shatov. I can characterize it as an honest opera, but acting according to the principle of Gleb Zheglov - "A thief should be in prison." From here he has many ill-wishers. I want to say the following. Firstly, in response to Eugene from Moscow, the actions of the Former Chief of OHRR Martynenko show at least negligence (if he didn’t know anything, he just stupidly signed him with a palm-off), and the maximum is an abuse of official position if he knew). And therefore Martynenko should have a “tooth” not of the director of a private security company, company, etc., namely, on Shatov. Secondly, at least in our country in Bashkiria, only the base station and azimuth are given on the bearing. There is no question of any distance from the base station to the cellular subscriber, which means that it is impossible to accurately calculate the exact location of the cellular subscriber, but only its direction is possible. In addition, according to the official testimony of an expert from a mobile operator on a similar issue, available in the materials on a specific criminal case, it is not a fact that this base station was to detect this subscriber. In addition to this subscriber, another base station can be located, located, for example, 100-200 km from the location of the subscriber, but the first did this because of the "overloaded" second base station. Thirdly, detailing the “customer” and the “epaulette” will yield nothing but internal conviction, and as far as I know, this is what Shatov already knows.
In my opinion, Shatov was obliged to combine both defense and attack, which he was advised by Karpovich and Kuznetsov. In conclusion - do what you must - and be what it will be. and getting ready for the worst, hoping for the best.

 

[Евгений СБ]

Hello! I personally know Shatov. I can characterize it as an honest opera, but acting according to the principle of Gleb Zheglov - "A thief should be in prison." From here he has many ill-wishers. I want to say the following. Firstly, in response to Eugene from Moscow, the actions of the Former Chief of OHRR Martynenko show at least negligence (if he didn’t know anything, he just stupidly signed him with a palm-off), and the maximum is an abuse of official position if he knew). And therefore Martynenko should have a “tooth” not of the director of a private security company, company, etc., namely, on Shatov. Secondly, at least in our country in Bashkiria, only the base station and azimuth are given on the bearing. There is no question of any distance from the base station to the cellular subscriber, which means that it is impossible to accurately calculate the exact location of the cellular subscriber, but only its direction is possible. In addition, according to the official testimony of an expert from a mobile operator on a similar issue, available in the materials on a specific criminal case, it is not a fact that this base station was to detect this subscriber. In addition to this subscriber, another base station can be located, located, for example, 100-200 km from the location of the subscriber, but the first did this because of the "overloaded" second base station. Thirdly, detailing the “customer” and the “epaulette” will yield nothing but internal conviction, and as far as I know, this is what Shatov already knows.
In my opinion, Shatov was obliged to combine both defense and attack, which he was advised by Karpovich and Kuznetsov. In conclusion - do what you must - and be what it will be. and getting ready for the worst, hoping for the best.

I do not agree with Alexander. Charge negligence Martynenko is hardly possible in principle. Not he collects the necessary documents, but his subordinates. They bring packages of documents for his signature. Those. he initially a priori trusts them. Otherwise, why are they needed at all? To double-check the work done for them. The maximum that he can here be attributed to the poor organization of work and inadequate control on his part. And this is nothing more than - a mismatch of the position, in the worst case scenario.
Abuse to prove (if I knew) is also practically unrealistic. This is hardly documented as a documentary. Even if his former subordinates would point against him, the simplest thing would be to say that he was being spoken about and trying to blame him.
It is hard to talk about billing with azimuths, having no idea about the real situation in place with towers and their remoteness from each other. In fact, having such information, the distance will not exceed half the distance between the towers. As an example: in Moscow, the distance between the towers is about 400 m. Thus, having an azimuth and a tower, you can understand that the subscriber was no further than 200 meters in that direction from a certain place. And why not use it for protection? What kind of inner conviction can we talk about here?
And I absolutely agree that in addition to defense you need to deal with attack.