Unscrupulous "detective" Tashkent

[Детективное агентство Оренбург]

A client turned up who was looking for a person in Tashkent with a complaint about a "detective" who, having received an advance, "jumped" from the order and disconnected the phones.
The money was transferred to the name of Viktor Belyaev. She contacted by phone (+998 97) 731 23 10. The ad on which he worked, most likely, was also deleted, as he could not be found. Rummaging a bit, I also found his ads and additional phones: (+998 97) 340 65 06 and (+998 94) 646 67 31 (https://tashkent.uzbekgo.com/post_12733_ ... ektiv.html)
e-mail: beliaev.vik@yandex.ru

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Hello, Igor! How confident is the adequacy of the client?

 

[Детективное агентство Оренбург]

Hello, Igor! How confident is the adequacy of the client?

I checked the information myself. The phone does not work (did not work). Enough time has passed (not a single week). I saw the transfer receipt, the data in the receipt and other data seem to converge. The client, in principle, does not want anything, it just crept in some distrust of the service providers, especially remotely (remotely from the customer). I will be glad that I am mistaken and in this case my apologies will naturally follow. He sent an informational letter to the Arena from Tashkent (he did not find other representatives on the forum), maybe he knows this.
Just a special case which will not add anything to honest detectives, but rather will reduce it. And who, no matter how we are, must first of all keep the mark of the profession. It’s one thing when the customer is unscrupulous (it’s his own fault that he allowed you to be punished). Another thing is when a person working under the brand of a detective rolls. So here, I think, any information should be taken out, and then if it is refuted and some explanations follow, it can be removed from the general review. This applies to members of the MOU. Not members, but especially illegal immigrants - who do not care about anything, they do not risk anything, they must undergo this procedure in a special manner, checking and at the request of one of the MOD members working in the region. So the base of "crooks" will be replenished faster and there will be less dissatisfied. Although this is my subjective opinion.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Thank!

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

Igor opinion is correct !!!

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

Hello, Igor! How confident is the adequacy of the client?

I checked the information myself. The phone does not work (did not work). Enough time has passed (not a single week). I saw the transfer receipt, the data in the receipt and other data seem to converge. The client, in principle, does not want anything, it just crept in some distrust of the service providers, especially remotely (remotely from the customer). I will be glad that I am mistaken and in this case my apologies will naturally follow. He sent an informational letter to the Arena from Tashkent (he did not find other representatives on the forum), maybe he knows this.
Just a special case which will not add anything to honest detectives, but rather will reduce it. And who, no matter how we are, must first of all keep the mark of the profession. It’s one thing when the customer is unscrupulous (it’s his own fault that he allowed you to be punished). Another thing is when a person working under the brand of a detective rolls. So here, I think, any information should be taken out, and then if it is refuted and some explanations follow, it can be removed from the general review. This applies to members of the MOU. Not members, but especially illegal immigrants - who do not care about anything, they do not risk anything, they must undergo this procedure in a special manner, checking and at the request of one of the MOD members working in the region. So the base of "crooks" will be replenished faster and there will be less dissatisfied. Although this is my subjective opinion.

Igor opinion is correct !!!

I support !!!

 

[Детективное агентство. Москва. Арбат.]

The correct opinion.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I join the opinion. That's right, Igor.

 

[ДНК]

I agree

 

[Частный детектив Нижний Новгород]

I agree with Igor.