Companies and entrepreneurs may be required to answer for

[Роберт]

The Law of the Russian Federation “On state secrets” is very logically applied. There exists a clear and exhaustive list of such information. By the way, commercial organizations also work with the state secret. And everything is normal with democracy there.

About the provision. An officer from the licensing system will come to you, present an appropriate resolution or letter of verification. How do you refuse him?

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

Good. What exactly is a trade secret? What information?
The issue of jurisdiction.
Why should the court consider the issue of admission to unknown information only because some dunce (I don't mean colleagues) called them a trade secret? Suddenly he is crazy? And law enforcement and the court should dance to his tune? : D

Robert, do not forget that EVERY CITIZEN has the right to protect his rights by the state. Restriction of a citizen's rights is allowed ONLY ON THE BASIS OF THE DECISION OF THE COURT.
Robert, and you have already familiarized yourself with the very Federal Law, which we are discussing. Here are just a few items from it. I think they will answer the above questions:
1) information constituting a trade secret (production secret) - information of any nature (production, technical, economic, organizational and others), including the results of intellectual activity in the scientific and technical field, as well as information on how to carry out professional activities, which have actual or potential commercial value due to the unknownness to their third parties, to which third parties do not have free access legally and in respect of which the regime of commercial secret has been introduced by the holder of such information;
2) The right to classify information as information constituting a trade secret and to determine the list and composition of such information belongs to the owner of such information.
HOPE QUESTION LIST YOU FALL OFF
3) The right to determine the list of information constituting a trade secret belongs to its owner!

 

[Роберт]

The end of the discussion.
Law enforcement and regulatory authorities are not third parties.
And they always need to provide everything.
The issue of jurisdiction remained open. Any court can find a lot of things not to consider (in the so-called “list” there is a lot of uncertainty). Maybe this is good for the owner of the secret, because everyone, except state bodies, will not be allowed to it (well, a small probability). Sometimes this is not necessary.
But, there may be many incidents: D

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

The Law of the Russian Federation “On state secrets” is very logically applied. There exists a clear and exhaustive list of such information. By the way, commercial organizations also work with the state secret. And everything is normal with democracy there.

About the provision. An officer from the licensing system will come to you, present an appropriate resolution or letter of verification. How do you refuse him?

Maybe I won’t refuse, but on one condition - I’ll study the decision on an unscheduled audit thoroughly The law clearly defines the list of grounds for conducting the audit and establishes the requirement for documentary evidence of the information that guides the LRR. And about the fact that they often “forget” to notify the prosecutor of the upcoming check, I generally am silent: D

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

Law enforcement and regulatory authorities are not third parties.

The two sides of the contractual relationship are understandable, but who then are these bodies?

 

[Роберт]

The two sides of the contractual relationship are clear, but who are these bodies then? [/ Quote]
Well, the clumsy little tip turned out. : D And all the conversations to the fact that from scratch, interpreting such a law, you can fill yourself up with figs of cones.

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

The two sides of the contractual relationship are understandable, but who then are these bodies?

Well, the clumsy little tip turned out. : D And all the conversations to the fact that from scratch, interpreting such a law, you can fill yourself up with figs of cones. [/quote]
No, not clumsy, just does not fall under the principles of the POLICE STATE: ugeek:

 

[Роберт]

All states are police and the rights of the police are respected in this Law. Nobody is going anywhere, everyone will provide.
And they’ll make a list anyway (these strange definitions like ".... that have actual or potential commercial value ....": D they’re fun, because there’s no way without experts). It will be very interesting to observe how the Law will be applied in practice. : D Especially litigation. It seems to me that it is not applicable. We always need specifics. Without it, the law will not work. So, a small damper from competitors (third parties: D).

 

[частный детектив СПб Санкт- Петербург]

All states are police and the rights of the police are respected in this Law. Nobody is going anywhere, everyone will provide.
And they’ll make a list anyway (these strange definitions like ".... that have actual or potential commercial value ....": D they’re fun, because there’s no way without experts). It will be very interesting to observe how the Law will be applied in practice. : D Especially litigation. It seems to me that it is not applicable. We always need specifics. Without it, the law will not work. So, a small damper from competitors (third parties: D).

"I read the criminal code." O. I. Bender.
___________________________________
Commentary on Art. 325 of the Criminal Code. Regarding the importance of the document.

11. Part 2 of the commented article provides liability for the abduction of a passport from a citizen (RF or another country) or another important personal document.

13. Another important personal document may be, within the meaning of Part 2, a pension certificate belonging to a citizen, a work or order book, a license to engage in the entrepreneurial activity indicated in it, buying a house, a driver’s license, etc. These personal documents are official. Their importance is judged by the court.

Respectfully,
Alexey Trofimov.

 

[частный детектив СПб Санкт- Петербург]

The court is nonsense. Read more articles on countering the legal requirements of law enforcement officials.

The existence of the judiciary is determined by the public interest in maintaining the legal and social order, and its state nature is the duty of the state to maintain this order. The judiciary arises by virtue of the necessity and obligation of the state to interpret its will when the normative interpretation proposed by the legislator for the general case and expressed in the norm of the law conflicts with the normative interpretation of the state will in the process of individual regulation. Preserving the universal and universal significance of law as a social regulator requires ensuring legal reality in the event of a dispute about the law itself. The ability and obligation to determine what is right in the event of a dispute about this in individual law enforcement forms the basis of the judiciary, determines its place and role in the system of separation of powers, as well as political factors, forms a unique judicial power resource.

Respectfully,
Alexey Trofimov.