Detective agency - business, additional earnings or a hobby?

[Частный детектив Самара.]

: D "You will not praise yourself, nor will anyone praise" folk wisdom ... And one more thing, "ask not old ask experienced". You have never had authority in life, and never will, do not hold out ... About rudeness and disrespect for people, do not generalize, the technique is known, but in this case it concerns you and this is not only my opinion.

Better than having a visiting card of an upstart and not a distant person. (At that age)

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Dear colleagues))) Of course, probably no one can have the right to teach anyone ... Especially at the Forum, in an open thread ... I propose still to stop mutual wrangling ... If anyone has something to say on the topic (specifically on topic of discussion), tell me ... If there is no trust in the initiator of the topic (I personally don’t have trust), you can simply skip it (the topic) ... Something like this ... Although, each can have its own (other) point view on this issue ...

 

[elitef]

Detective agency. Moscow. Dossier, Call - (if your posts aren’t banter: roll is very cool! How long have you been going to make sure that such a business can be called profitable?


ps On the issue of trust .. If the appeal went specifically to Detective N, then it would be nice even on the Internet to establish trust directly between themselves and N. In the meantime, the elements of anonymity can perhaps be preserved. At least until I find a suitable photo : lol :.
In the end, Andrei Zakharov correctly noted that the topic is open, everyone expresses his opinion. I do not force everyone to answer. Wanted - spoke out, discussed, no - no. I never thought that a forum (any: political, culinary, sports, everyday, and even this one) is a place where you can and should clearly determine what kind of person is. But individual personality traits are sometimes visible. If someone does something different from you, this does not mean that this person is wrong. There is an exchange of information, not an analysis of the identity of each user.

pp Once again I am convinced that the work in the bodies leaves its mark in communicating with mere mortals civil and in general. Nothing personal, just the pope has a 22-year seniority in the Security Service of Ukraine, it’s funny even to catch his correspondence from the time of service in correspondence: lol:

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

If there is such a dad, then why look for a detective on the Internet? Such a dad for anyone in the subject and can prompt and recommend a good specialist. Something somehow does not fit.
IMHO

 

[elitef]

Answered in drugs.
I think it will be more correct.
If you want to post a message in the subject - I do not mind.

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Well, yes: o All people are different and relationships in the family too. At the expense of communication in the forum, the first rather than the second, of course people come in with questions, but this is rare. In any case, serious conversations are conducted through other communication channels, so on this resource you are unlikely to find out something new and interesting, especially if you follow the correspondence, there are more people who have a DD hobby or a secondary occupation.

If you want a normal professional for your work, ask the forum administrators a question; they know many personally and can give recommendations.

 

[Письменный Сергей Алексеевич]

If you want a normal professional for your work, ask the forum administrators a question; they know many personally and can give recommendations.

You are right, Vitaly, only can a respected girl receive answers to her questions if there are questions: Where did the post I wrote yesterday disappeared?

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Well, this question should be asked to the "looker" behind the forum.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

If you want a normal professional for your work, ask the forum administrators a question; they know many personally and can give recommendations.

You are right, Vitaly, only can a respected girl receive answers to her questions if there are questions: Where did the post I wrote yesterday disappeared?

Good day, Sergey))) And this post, along with other posts that, in my opinion, were not correct enough, was deleted by administrator rights. I consider these posts to be incorrect in connection with the fact that, at least, a feature of a professional (especially a professional in the field of investigation (any state, private) is the ability to communicate with people (who are all different in essence) ... At least, when I started working in law enforcement agencies (since 1983), I had good mentors, experienced people (old-school) who taught me never to conflict with strangers (or little-known people), try to find a compromise in communication ... I taught this from my "pupils" ... This is very important, both in life and in work ... Including working with sources of information ... If you conflict, you won’t get any information at all. ..Of course people have changed a little ... Communication has become "virtual", sources of information mainly from databases and from the Internet (in absentia) ... It takes less time to communicate with specific people ... I think the Forum was created for to discuss purely professional topics, and not in order to conflict with other people and bring these conflicts to the public ... If anyone wants a conflict, contact the "personal" ... And in the future, such conflict situations will be "resolved" in a similar way. ..This is my point of view on these issues ... I myself am not a conflict person ... I came to the Forum in order to learn something (learn to live for a century), and not to conflict with anyone, or even more so, to participate in conflict situations with people unfamiliar to me ... And I think this point of view is correct ...
And on the question of personal opinion regarding the investigation, I can say the following ... If anyone has a desire to see whether he is a professional person or not (taking into account the opinion of the person who positions himself as a pro), you can see the BH sites on which BH data they advertise themselves as pros working with pro groups (I haven’t seen a single site where it wasn’t reflected) ... However, much of what is written on these sites is not true for some (it's just self-promotion) ... Therefore , in my opinion, in order to hear real answers from the participants of the Forum, you probably need to, so to speak, “enter trust in them” ... There will be no trust, there will be no frankness ... But there will be no frankness, the survey loses its meaning .. .

 

[Арсен]

If you want a normal professional for your work, ask the forum administrators a question; they know many personally and can give recommendations.

You are right, Vitaly, only can a respected girl receive answers to her questions if there are questions: Where did the post I wrote yesterday disappeared?

Good day, Sergey))) And this post, along with other posts that, in my opinion, were not correct enough, was deleted by administrator rights. I consider these posts to be incorrect in connection with the fact that, at least, a feature of a professional (especially a professional in the field of investigation (any state, private) is the ability to communicate with people (who are all different in essence) ... At least, when I started working in law enforcement agencies (since 1983), I had good mentors, experienced people (old-school) who taught me never to conflict with strangers (or little-known people), try to find a compromise in communication ... I taught this from my "pupils" ... This is very important, both in life and in work ... Including working with sources of information ... If you conflict, you won’t get any information at all. ..Of course people have changed a little ... Communication has become "virtual", sources of information mainly from databases and from the Internet (in absentia) ... It takes less time to communicate with specific people ... I think the Forum was created for to discuss purely professional topics, and not in order to conflict with other people and bring these conflicts to the public ... If anyone wants a conflict, contact the "personal" ... And in the future, such conflict situations will be "resolved" in a similar way. ..This is my point of view on these issues ... I myself am not a conflict person ... I came to the Forum in order to learn something (learn to live for a century), and not to conflict with anyone, or even more so, to participate in conflict situations with people unfamiliar to me ... And I think this point of view is correct ...
And on the question of personal opinion regarding the investigation, I can say the following ... If anyone has a desire to see whether he is a professional person or not (taking into account the opinion of the person who positions himself as a pro), you can see the BH sites on which BH data they advertise themselves as pros working with pro groups (I haven’t seen a single site where it wasn’t reflected) ... However, much of what is written on these sites is not true for some (it's just self-promotion) ... Therefore , in my opinion, in order to hear real answers from the participants of the Forum, you probably need to, so to speak, “enter trust in them” ... There will be no trust, there will be no frankness ... But there will be no frankness, the survey loses its meaning .. .

I support!