Answer the question TOGETHER !!

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

SO, COLLEAGUES !!! SUMMING UP
1. MANY THANKS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE ANSWERS TO THE Tricky QUESTION
2. I HAVE UNDERSTANDED AGAIN- THE CASE SOMETHING- OUR COLLEAGUE WILL NOT REMAIN “ONE-ON-ONE” WITH SOMETHING ..... so many answers in a short period of time
3. COLLECTIVE DECISION- WHEN RESOLVING THE QUESTION TO CREATE AN ALIBE, IN THE SECOND CASE (ITS CHECK) UNDER A GOOD PERFORMANCE, WE REFUSE THE CLIENT (legally, ethically, and no interests are violated)

THANKS AGAIN ALL THANKS

 

[Частный детектив. Мезрин. Севастополь.]

Yes, and do not forget that creating an alibi to someone, you can be an accomplice in illegal activities. Is it necessary?)))

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

An interesting situation with an alibi ... I agree with colleagues that it is better to leave only an alibi check, but if such a situation takes place
it all depends on how well you organized your alibi. If everything is clean and without crime, then in principle it is possible to “confirm” such an alibi, well, if there is no such guarantee, then you need to find a reason to refuse verification. Although force majeure may occur here (there will be someone who finds out what’s the matter and then there may be troubles)

"Troubles" - it is very gently said!
Then it’s better indeed - force majeure! Because an earthquake, in comparison with the rest, will look like a nuisance.

 

[detektyvas]

Yes, and do not forget that creating an alibi to someone, you can be an accomplice in illegal activities. Is it necessary?)))

Correctly said, only an alibi check.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

[
Overslept everything again ... Help! I support a collegial decision - it will be so!
How is an article written?

But don’t call it, anyway the solution is general .... The article is at the stage of generalization of materials for it

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

SO, COLLEAGUES !!! SUMMING UP
1. MANY THANKS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE ANSWERS TO THE Tricky QUESTION
2. I HAVE UNDERSTANDED AGAIN- THE CASE SOMETHING- OUR COLLEAGUE WILL NOT REMAIN “ONE-ON-ONE” WITH SOMETHING ..... so many answers in a short period of time
3. COLLECTIVE DECISION- WHEN RESOLVING THE QUESTION TO CREATE AN ALIBE, IN THE SECOND CASE (ITS CHECK) UNDER A GOOD PERFORMANCE, WE REFUSE THE CLIENT (legally, ethically, and no interests are violated)

THANKS AGAIN ALL THANKS

Overslept everything again ... Help! I support a collegial decision - it will be so!

How is an article written?

Help in a hurry with the adoption of a resume, forgetting about the time distance, time zones.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Who goes to bed, and who just woke up.
Time zones, you know.

 

[Anonymous]

Alibi (from lat. Alibi - elsewhere) - a legal term used in criminal law.

This term usually refers to the presence of circumstances that indicate the impossibility of the accused or suspect being at the time of the crime. In particular, the alibi of the accused can be recognized as proven if it is reliably established that he was in a different place at the time of the crime. Such an alibi is called objective. Sometimes a subjective alibi also stands out, which means the impossibility of committing a crime in connection with the personality characteristics of the accused.
The creation of a pseudo-alibi is criminally punishable, at least in Russia, this is called either forgery or perjury, but it is proved very difficult, so there is little judicial practice.
Itself got into such a situation. A certain “legal” office provided a participant in the process (the opposite side, where I participate) with the aim of eliminating me from conducting the case of false witnesses who in court gave me false testimonies in this woman’s lawsuit against me about protecting her honor, dignity and business reputation. At the ATTORNEY forum I asked for help in such matters, since I first encountered this. The process is limited in time, and to refute their version, a specific check is needed. I think that I will lose the process, money as compensation for moral harm seems to recover from me. And to hell with them with money, not so much this woman asks for her honor, only 50,000 rubles, the essence is not in money, but in truth.
Therefore, HELPYCH is true, no matter how good or bad it is, it will remain true. And the lie will remain a lie.
PS
Lies - obviously false information, untruth, fiction, misinformation. Deliberate concealment and fabrication by transmitting factual and emotional information (verbally or non-verbally) in order to create (or hold) in another person a belief that the transmitter himself considers to be contrary to the truth. Sometimes a lie is called the inadvertent creation and retention of opinions, which the transmitter can consider to be true, but the inconsistency with the truth of which is proved, confirmed and known, but for this case the term "error" is more often used. P. Ekman defines a lie as "a deliberate decision to mislead the person to whom the information is addressed, without warning of his intention to do so."

 

[ДНК]

Hmm ... gentlemen ... but the question with a sub-secret was .... will you work for yourself .... (a stranger against a predator blinnnn) ... the answer is obvious - no, we won’t, but in such a situation even we make more safety and check for ourselves the created alibi ..... but, and if you do not turn the question around much ..... you are doing an alibi check or even just carrying out any detective activities in favor of the client and stumble upon your colleagues who faithfully fulfill the order an opponent of your client already and collecting information regarding him (your client) ... and here you are face to face, grin to the grin, against each other, detective to read the detective (or opponent’s SB) ..... and what's next ......

 

[Детективное агентство Москва]

I overslept a discussion, damn it! )))
No offense to Halpych, but creating an alibi is an activity unworthy of a true detective. This is a deliberate deception of someone
and our true function is to provide customers with true information.