Competitive intelligence in the Premier League business

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

But there is an important point. Which, perhaps, distinguishes a good specialist from not very good. A good specialist rarely refuses work on the grounds that she requires breaking the law. In many cases, he knows how to figure out how to do things and not break the law. And not very good - can not.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Detective agency. Mongoose. Ufa wrote (a):
If a special or private detective so constantly raises a question, then he will eventually be left without customers! Or isn’t it?

I can’t say anything about the detective. I can only personally to myself. I refuse about 80 percent of requests for one reason or another. But I do not suffer from a lack of interesting and complex work.
Well, of course, you can decide for yourself what you do and how.

It’s good to say that when a specialist in the Kyrgyz Republic has another place of work, a different, main income, and a private detective, we take it specifically, this is the main one, there is no other, the type of earnings, I live, I receive income only from investigation. And if I refuse 80% to potential clients, then I will burn out, I will be bankrupt, I will need to leave for another method of work.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Detective agency. Mongoose. Ufa wrote (a):
If so, then the customer will go to the one who will solve his assigned task. Which means that he lost a client. Is not it so?

Yes, probably. Have you tried trading heroin? They say it’s profitable. The truth is illegal, but you, as I understand it, are not concerned with the legitimacy of the business, but that the customers are not lost? I understand you correctly?

I have not tried to trade heroin and will not, because my favorite profession is crime detection, which I did while working in the UR and doing it now whenever possible. And this assumption, the question (about trafficking heroin), I think, to put it mildly, incorrect. Given that 99% of you did not work in operational positions in law enforcement, I forgive you for this. I already wrote above that in our time, in our country, the current government, we, private detectives, are placed in such conditions when we are forced to walk along the edge of a knife, balance on the verge of the law, but we have a sense of proportion, we know boundaries that do not we will transgress or we will transgress in exceptional cases (in the name of justice, for the good of the motherland). And about the loss of customers, I said above

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

But there is an important point. Which, perhaps, distinguishes a good specialist from not very good. A good specialist rarely refuses work on the grounds that she requires breaking the law. In many cases, he knows how to figure out how to do things and not break the law. And not very good - can not.

I would like to clarify: in many cases a good specialist knows how to figure out how to do things, and that nobody can add to him, or so that he can “excuse himself” motivatedly.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

But there is an important point. Which, perhaps, distinguishes a good specialist from not very good. A good specialist rarely refuses work on the grounds that she requires breaking the law. In many cases, he knows how to figure out how to do things and not break the law. And not very good - can not.

I would like to clarify: in many cases a good specialist knows how to figure out how to do things, and that nobody can add to him, or so that he can “excuse himself” motivatedly.

There is the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. He sets the framework. If you are within this framework, you are not breaking the law. If you go beyond this, you are breaking the law.
The rest is the personal opinion of each person. Opinion may be different. But the law is either violated or not. Thus, the Law differs from morality and traditions - in that it is quite strictly defined.

My signature says: "You do not always need to strive to burglarize if you can enter through the door." A good specialist is looking for a door. Not very good - considers burglary as the only possible option.
By and large, this is already art. Here, creativity is needed, plus formal knowledge.
It's like artists: an album, paints and brushes are sold in any store. But the pictures are different.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

But there is an important point. Which, perhaps, distinguishes a good specialist from not very good. A good specialist rarely refuses work on the grounds that she requires breaking the law. In many cases, he knows how to figure out how to do things and not break the law. And not very good - can not.

I would like to clarify: in many cases a good specialist knows how to figure out how to do things, and that nobody can add to him, or so that he can “excuse himself” motivatedly.

There is the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. He sets the framework. If you are within this framework, you are not breaking the law. If you go beyond this, you are breaking the law.
The rest is the personal opinion of each person. Opinion may be different. But the law is either violated or not. Thus, the Law differs from morality and traditions - in that it is quite strictly defined.

My signature says: "You do not always need to strive to burglarize if you can enter through the door." A good specialist is looking for a door. Not very good - considers burglary as the only possible option.
By and large, this is already art. Here, creativity is needed, plus formal knowledge.
It's like artists: an album, paints and brushes are sold in any store. But the pictures are different.

One way or another, but you and I are talking about the same thing, but from a different perspective: you do not have a law, there is only a criminal code, and I have both a criminal code and a law that limits me. You are more a theorist, but I am a practitioner. We are in different dimensions.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

You screen out 80% of potential orders, I'm in the region of 20-30%. At the same time, I work if I see that a person is not a bandit, not a swindler, but a normal person who has fallen into a difficult situation. I seek to help him, despite the Law, while naturally, trying to calculate the consequences of my help from different angles ...

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

In my opinion, in my humble opinion, this can end the exchange of views ...

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

You screen out 80% of potential orders, I'm in the region of 20-30%. At the same time, I work if I see that a person is not a bandit, not a swindler, but a normal person who has fallen into a difficult situation. I seek to help him, despite the Law, while naturally, trying to calculate the consequences of my help from different angles ...

Clear. But I’m not working despite the law. But everyone chooses his own path and consequences.

But, pay attention to an interesting fact: Competitive intelligence, as a phenomenon, cannot violate the law. A man, of course, has the technical ability to do this, but if the Criminal Code is violated, a competitive intelligence specialist becomes a criminal - an industrial spy.
My question is: who in this case - when the law is violated in the work - becomes a Private Detective?

 

[Турабян Владимир]

NOW SPECIFICALLY I CAN ALREADY GENERALIZE EVERYTHING SPOKEN IN THIS TOPIC: DO NOT LIGHT AND DO NOT EXTEND YOURSELF !!! AND IF THE TRUTH IS TALKED, ANYONE PERSONALIZING ON THIS TOPIC A SPECIALIST MAY BE SUBMITTED UNDER THE APPROPRIATE ARTICLE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE AND AS IT WOULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED !!!