polygraph specialist

[dron]

Dear State Councilor! Calm down please. And I was not going to cooperate with all forum participants. Sometimes from some cooperation there is more harm than good. Special thanks for inviting me to the conference. : D But it seems that you are not its organizer, or have I messed up something?

The teachings of the Privy Councilor are certainly important, but they smack of some sort of discrimination. Don't you find? Someone here before, on this forum, someone later. Someone has some knowledge, someone else. But at the same time, the point of view of any of the forum participants should be equal. I stated that detectives sometimes lack certain knowledge and experience (in the field of polygraphology) and that they make mistakes, but this is not fatal - you cannot be fully competent at once in everything. But the ability to listen to fair criticism and at the same time not to be offended is lacking here. Also, a certain tact is lacking and people who are not competent in anything are puffing at all costs and will teach professionals from an adjacent but completely different field!

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Oh !!! .... Drone !!! I completely forgot !!!! There is KNOW-HOW for your team !!! ......
1. Find in the "RUBOP bases" information about terrible crimes Help and Advisor (Denis, who) and 16 convictions for each ....
2. With this, go to the forum with a new topic "Criminals Help and Counselor DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS OF COMMUNICATION WITH DETECTIVES !!" ... Well, there you will simultaneously ADD ADVERTISEMENT of your methods .... You can glue the topic ....
(all that is not clear, the boss Volkov will learn) .....

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Dear State Councilor! Calm down please. And I was not going to cooperate with all forum participants. Sometimes from some cooperation there is more harm than good. Special thanks for inviting me to the conference. : D But it seems that you are not its organizer, or have I messed up something?

The teachings of the Privy Councilor are certainly important, but they smack of some sort of discrimination. Don't you find? Someone here before, on this forum, someone later. Someone has some knowledge, someone else. But at the same time, the point of view of any of the forum participants should be equal. I stated that detectives sometimes lack certain knowledge and experience (in the field of polygraphology) and that they make mistakes, but this is not fatal - you cannot be fully competent at once in everything. But the ability to listen to fair criticism and at the same time not to be offended is lacking here. Also, a certain tact is lacking and people who are not competent in anything are puffing at all costs and will teach professionals from an adjacent but completely different field!

1. Any participant has the right to invite to the conference ..... (again messed up the same)
2. The first to say about discrimination is the drone. Prior to this, worthy colleagues joined the community. To do this, you just need to communicate and strive to work together without left thoughts
3. Even a superficial understanding of polygraphology allows you to determine a scam by primary signs
4. And nowhere, not once, no one taught you, Dron, in your methodology .... Everyone has the right to speak out for what a mile away "smells" of divorce ....
The adviser will complement ...... I expressed a subjective (as in the whole topic) opinion ...

 

[dron]

Here again, not the professionalism of Help and Uri. He writes about the polygraph as the vague direction of the MOD forum. I want to ask him in response Your camera or the computer from which you are writing, are vaguely related to the forum? And why did the polygraph suddenly become vaguely related to it? What is advertising - a statement on the topic is not yet advertising. Anyone, including you, has a personal page. There is no detailed description of the product or service, there are no prices and, especially, banking services. What makes you (besides hostility towards me) raise this topic again and again?

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Let us turn to the original source:

For those who will be interested in this, we offer the following service: checking people getting a job (where there are risks for the employer). This is the so-called questionnaire option. It consists of 2 sheets on one questions with numbers, on the second sheet only numbers. A person reads a question and answers in writing (in expanded form) on the second sheet against the figure to which the question corresponds. The numbers need to be distributed on the sheet evenly vertically. Then, having received the answers in this way,
scan the image and send it to me. There will be 5 or 6 sheets in total. I, in turn, process it and send you the result. You transfer money to the account indicated on the site. The cost of such a check is only 200 rubles per person. I will send you a questionnaire for such a survey in this letter.
The second more difficult option. In the event of an investigation. A man writes an explanation. You are located not far from him and watch how he does it. On each sheet, he must answer one question on the control topic (usually at the beginning of the sheet), I will send these questions to you each time. To do this, I need to know the plot of the case. You tell me her. Then, writing an explanation of up to 5 sheets, you scan the image plus translate the text into Russian and send these two documents to me. I process and send you the result. You are transferring money for work. The cost of such work is 3500 rubles.
I look forward to work from you, which we will do together.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

Dear State Councilor! Calm down please. And I was not going to cooperate with all forum participants. Sometimes from some cooperation there is more harm than good. Special thanks for inviting me to the conference. : D But it seems that you are not its organizer, or have I messed up something?

The teachings of the Privy Councilor are certainly important, but they smack of some sort of discrimination. Don't you find? Someone here before, on this forum, someone later. Someone has some knowledge, someone else. But at the same time, the point of view of any of the forum participants should be equal. I stated that detectives sometimes lack certain knowledge and experience (in the field of polygraphology) and that they make mistakes, but this is not fatal - you cannot be fully competent at once in everything. But the ability to listen to fair criticism and at the same time not to be offended is lacking here. Also, a certain tact is lacking and people who are not competent in anything are puffing at all costs and will teach professionals from an adjacent but completely different field!

Dear Drone!
I tried to be loyal to you, and colleagues can confirm this. But you still have not learned the very truth of what I tried to focus your attention on. I have never dealt with discrimination, and even more so, I cannot deal with it in to your family - International Association of Detectives a-priory. Each of us is worthy of respect. WE ARE HERE - ONE FAMILY. ( I repeat this expression from the previous topic, because you never heard of it the first time). But you continue to stand your ground, expressing your thoughts in a harsh form. Keep in mind that soon you will have nothing to do here, for the simple reason that you will not have anyone to talk to. And this is not a threat. I simply foresee this situation in advance, seeing how you communicate with my respected colleagues.
He who wants, he seeks means, he who does not want, he seeks reasons.
There is no longer a desire to explain something to you, and even communicate with you in general. In relation to you, I just concluded.
Good luck to you.

 

[dron]

Thank you for the remark that you express your subjective opinion (which does not necessarily correspond to the truth) Help and Uri, tell me what signs of a scam you found, I just found it interesting! Share with the people if you are so special! : lol:: lol:

Second, how can you regard your statements on this topic as non-ernism and teachings, re-read all your statements, maybe you will understand for yourself. (Especially statements about how to answer people in the questionnaire).

 

[dron]

Dear private detective Budaev. The "Source" sample you posted is more like what? On advertising, no. It is similar to the description of the technology what actions need to be done to get the service. There is no description of the service itself. Yes, even if it were so that people could use it, is this a problem, is it that someone’s rights are violated?
Everything new in people always causes rejection at first, and only after some time is acceptance.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Thank you for the remark that you express your subjective opinion (which does not necessarily correspond to the truth) Help and Uri, tell me what signs of a scam you found, I just found it interesting! Share with the people if you are so special! : lol:: lol:
(Especially statements about how to answer people in the questionnaire).

I share with the people according to the SIGNS of SCAM:

1. When the question is asked: "Your name is Igor?", Instead of the answer " Yes ", I according to the so-called" Methodology "should answer:" My name is Igor. This name was given to me by my parents in ___ year, when I was born in ._____, etc. "Otherwise (with the obvious answer" YES ") - the technique DOES NOT WORK (!!!!)
- CONCLUSION: either the questions are NOT PROFESSIONALLY drawn up, or this is a SCAM, where are the “questions and answers” on the drum, because it doesn’t matter = the result is initially shuffled.
2. The detective, at the direction of "Spets", is forced to ask these questions to the object, demanding the same detailed answers, for verified normal people, which are either the cause of laughter or the cause of sarcasm. In addition, the detective is required to artificially escalate fear and tension during the survey.
CONCLUSION: instead of a quick check on order, the detective is the object of ridicule
3. As an experiment (the most extreme), I am sure that the test report for 98% consists of general phrases, which the customer of the test can interpret as it suits him.
CONCLUSION: The use of non-verified (not verified) information in the BH operation is a direct sign of a SCAM.

More in communication on this subject DO NOT COMMUNICATE. I consider the presence of the Drone methodology on the forum ADVERTISING, PR for the service with ALL SIGNS OF SCAM and ATTEMPTS TO EARN MONEY on a SPREADED RESOURCE (our FORUM)

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

The "Source" sample you posted is more like what?

The source is an original example of network marketing at the Forum.
I used to affirm and now affirm. Therefore, I propose, for such cases, to use separate specialized branches and special conditions for the placement of materials.