Hello again!
They reproach me for taking advantage of the forum, for the main goal of promoting my service, and even in organizing network marketing.
1. And who is not promoting here? Karma is not a PR tool? Member page of MOD - is this not a PR tool? Finally, the obligatory links to the current site of the enterprise with the banner MOD- is not this a PR tool? And articles and programs by private detectives, isn't this a PR tool? What are you fooling me then? We are all right here, we don’t want anything for ourselves from this site, just talk!
2. Network marketing. I dealt with it and ask to be accurate in my assessments. Neither anything in common with him nor anything. Network marketing is not possible without building a pyramid. Well, first of all, from potential customers, services can be done at MOD, but what about the second or third, etc. What will they subscribe to, what will they distribute? Network marketing has a product whose purpose the organizer has is to market it; due to this, he shares part of his profit with distributors, paying them fees, and what will detectives share with them if they succeed or should I set such prices for the service that it will simply be unprofitable to fulfill it? So, the promotion of a product or service is not network marketing!
3. The technique for the polygraph examiner is sacred. New types of printing devices appear, but slow down, they use the old methods recognized in Russia and in other countries of the world. Why is that? Why do not they invent a new technique every time for new equipment, because inventing a psychological technique is troublesome and it must withstand the test of time. Here is one of the forum participants blurted out with a fool that the technique is bad, not working. And at the same time, he believed in some polygraph examiner. And what happened at the same time, he slandered me. If there is a desire, I can bring the methodology to the court in the form of a printed publication, but how will he bring the private opinion of the polygraph examiner to the court? How do you think the judge will believe the document or the person who wished to remain anonymous?
4. Now why am I so sure that this works. For me it is obvious, as well as the fact that tomorrow the Sun will rise again over the Earth. Somewhere 2.5 years ago, I was preparing to meet with one of the very large customers. I was new to working with the Caligraph, but not new to working with a regular polygraph. He asked me to do, as well as you test verification of the document "confession." Clearly, the turnout was already written, just without any psychological troubles. I figured that the equipment should cope anyway and loaded it into the program. I got a certain result and gave it to the customer. To which he said to me: "Thank you, we do not need your services!" I asked why? To which he replied: "We have other information about this person, which diametrically diverges in your conclusions." After that, I began to think, and what did I do of this, that I got such not-so-good results. And then I realized - EVERYTHING, I just ignored the methodology (I downloaded the text without control questions about which we talked a lot) and the machine had no choice but to give false results. After this incident, I had more than 200 works in the practice of working with the Calligrapher, and never after that I had to worry about the result. Just because I strictly adhere to the current methodology in my work. I do not distribute it, but use it as a kind of working tool.
Original message
