Hello forum users!
They called me a sausage maker. I wanted to clarify my point of view. Yes, I'm not a private detective, that's right. Nevertheless, I have been directly involved in the investigation for 15 years. What prevents me from getting the crust of a private detective is formally nothing. But let's take a look at the Law you are working on. There you will find that private detective work should be your main job and it is not permissible to combine it, for example, with the same security activities. There is a list of functions that you can carry out when doing your job. Including there is a function to interrogate citizens. But there is no function to conduct any examination or any research! My activity is mainly related to obtaining judicial evidence i.e. conduct an examination or research specialist. How will the judge look at this crust, will it be enough for her to make a challenge on this basis. I think yes". Although there are lawyers more competent than me and they can comment.
Not interested in forum life. Do I need it? "The first thing, the first thing is airplanes, and then the girls, and the girls later." I was not born today and detectives gathered here different. There are many retrograde cities that came from the police and other law enforcement agencies. They still consider the polygraph to be something serious, parapsychology and trust only their fists. I do not experience any illusions about them - these are people with a prevailing stereotype of thinking and work with them vryat whether they will succeed. It’s just that they initially believe in the failure of this event, set up themselves and customers in the appropriate way. I suppose that Help and Uri are one of them, but I don’t understand why here on this forum there is an atmosphere of fawning over the strong. "I'll see what he says and what he does" is the main motto of most members of the forum. Nevertheless, I am grateful to Help and Uri only for the fact that he at least made an attempt to hold the event.
At the very beginning of the discussion, a great idea sounded that it’s not bad to go through prisons, because it’s not a secret that there (official data that sounds from the central television channels sits up to half of people who did not commit a crime for which they are serving their sentences). A polygraph examiner, even the coolest one, will not be allowed into a zone or a prison. But to write an explanation, no one will forbid. It will not be difficult for you to find such people; to find a lawyer who has been involved in the case, too. Here you have the front of work. And do not wait for something (the right combination of planets in the sky or something else). We must act. Law offices are looking for a customer and are ready to tear each other up for a small order, I chewed everything for you here and put the gag on, and you hesitate. Maybe you have a lot of other work, then this is a good argument. For those who really want to go in this direction, they are ready to share all their best practices, the rest is superfluous information.
I have already reported the number of how many conclusions I made on Caligraf. And in only four cases, I myself had to select material from the subject from this amount. In other cases, this was done by lawyers, human rights activists, investigators, and heads of private security companies. They did it! I do not believe that you yourself are not able to do the same! Do it right, stupidly following the instructions that I send to each customer. Because if this is not done, distortions appear, such as we observed in the Help and Uri work.
...дальше можно продолжать список, но для меня лично все давно понятно с собеседником Дроном и каждый очередной его пост только утверждает меня в правильности своего вывода. 
