As for scoring goals about torture) this is not a horror story of some kind not common flare. As I said, I work with lawyers and human rights defenders, respectively, the clients themselves from prisons from the zones. And they write in their explanations about these unlawful methods of investigating the investigation. It makes no difference to me which client will be, I don’t choose this. I mentioned it in prison, because this track is already trodden (from a legal point of view) and I know most of the pitfalls. There are no clients, there are no problems. But in another segment there can be competition with contact polygraphs, and they are polygraph examiners) in many cities. And with equal starting opportunities (the client agreed, the client is healthy and has reached age, the client is not a psychopath, the room is good, the polygraph examiner is experienced and literate - it’s really not known that it’s better to go to a contact polygraph or to a Caligraf. The polygraph was originally thought of as an alternative to torture. If the detectives on the other topic honestly talked about the fact that they never used this equipment, it somehow characterizes them, what methods they use. And Caligra is just a variation of it. So for them, for these detectives, anyway- Do not use contact or contactless - all one. They just use the other (other methods), but how will they not tell you frankly about themselves.
Original message
