Uluslararası Bilimsel ve Pratik Konferans (Ukrayna).

[abbat]

no offense, just a misunderstanding.

Accepted: D
What to do with this:?::?::?:

The Joker "47 minutes ago
...
no answers to questions to organizers yet ...
I repeat the questions
- on what conditions (initially) was proposed participation (co-organization) in the CDD;
- percentage of announced participants to real presence;
- was Znikin present at the NPK ...
- Did Harchenko really say what was published in net;

I’ll ask you to note that these questions are also of interest to representatives of the MOD: P

SKF Budaev and partners. Tula. "Today, 09:36
To realize the truth, you need to get acquainted with the truth from the organizers of the Conference.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Such a turn of the statement (highlighted in color) provides for the imposition of the intended answer to the interlocutor ...

What kind of answer am I imposing on you with my question, Roma:

What do you think about the conference?

 

[abbat]

Such a turn of the statement (highlighted in color) provides for the imposition of the intended answer to the interlocutor ...

What kind of answer am I imposing on you with my question, Roma:

What do you think about the conference?

Kostyaayayayaya, even you can’t talk to me: P: lol:
Do not turn the arrows on me ... in your post you talked to the "witch" and "imposed" the answer to HER: P: D
To quote excerpts from your posts:?::!:: Roll:
: P: lol:

Naroooood !!! You yourself are not funny yet:?:

Matushkin Andrey. Yesterday, 23:13
Let's wait for George or Dmitry.

Dima waited, the "witch" "looked at the light", and there are no answers to four SIMPLE questions
Let's wait for George:?:: Roll:
: D

 

[Ведьма]

Good time, days!
I answer people far from science, do not want to participate, do not force.
I personally shouldn’t owe anything to anyone: to be counted or to be responsible for someone, I have not enough free time to spend it on unnecessary conversations ......
I want to answer those for whom the development of legislation on this topic is interesting.
If such an event is held, then a scientific controversy arises, I don’t think it is necessary to discuss Vadim Borisovich’s report, those present asked him questions, to judge some, about his report and to perceive it as someone wants, LORD, THIS is your deeply subjective opinion, to which you certainly have a right. The entire report was not published, the journalists cited only a quote. Vadim Borisovich is an excellent specialist in the field of criminal law and lectures at the highest level, and he is a wonderful person (personally known for many years). I will definitely try to introduce those who want to communicate constructively.
In the evening I will unsubscribe again.
bye Bye.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Kostyaayayayaya, even you can’t talk to me

I do not engage in the implementation of unrealistic plans.
To blurt you is empty chores.
You can chat ... only you, Roma ...

 

[Письменный Сергей Алексеевич]

Dear colleagues, and if this is not secret information, and who else from the forum participants was at this actively discussed conference? As I understand it, besides George, Dmitry and Matushkin A.N. nobody else? It turns out her "ignored" EVERYTHING? And here are colleagues from the VAChD? And who of the Ukrainian detectives was at this conference, are they still not members of the VAChD? It’s just that the conference didn’t turn out to be NPK, but just a scientific conference, so this is a question for the organizers, and not for each other. After all, everyone knows that they back in early December (I could be wrong) organized an event in the Carpathians on similar issues, which will be held in the coming days? Why, then, sort things out, well, learned minds gathered, I didn’t understand who exactly, at first they wrote and attended, there were about 130 people, then they wrote that someone was in person, someone in absentia. I can’t understand anything at all. During the discussion, the question is asked: how is the scientist’s performance evaluated? One side appreciates - well done, the other does not agree. "Joker" asks a question and wants to get an answer on the speech of a particular lawyer, receives answers from the participants "why didn’t you come by yourself, etc.?" Why didn’t you come? Why didn’t I come? I do not understand. As I understand it, one question: “Do detectives support Kharchenko’s position? That's all. I personally DO NOT SUPPORT and CONDEMN THIS KIND OF STATEMENT, therefore I published this article on the forum. I like the position of Ukrainian lawyers, I’ll be glad to work with them together, if such an opportunity is provided. For some reason, no one condemns them. Good luck to everyone.

 

[abbat]

Good time, days!
I answer people far from science, do not want to participate, do not force.
I personally shouldn’t owe anything to anyone: to be counted or to be responsible for someone, I have not enough free time to spend it on unnecessary conversations ......
I want to answer those for whom the development of legislation on this topic is interesting.
If such an event is held, then a scientific controversy arises, I don’t think it is necessary to discuss Vadim Borisovich’s report, those present asked him questions, to judge some, about his report and to perceive it as someone wants, LORD, THIS is your deeply subjective opinion, to which you certainly have a right. The entire report was not published, the journalists cited only a quote. Vadim Borisovich is an excellent specialist in the field of criminal law and lectures at the highest level, and he is a wonderful person (personally known for many years). I will definitely try to introduce those who want to communicate constructively.
In the evening I will unsubscribe again.
bye Bye.

I'm sorry, ma'am:!:
After all, no one asks for a report ... People who are far from science in no way detract from any human qualities ... But these same people do not quite understand why a highly educated lawyer allows himself such legal mistakes ...
In relation to Mr. Kharchenko, only this unclear people far from science:!:

And practicing detectives do not understand why you can’t answer FOUR SIMPLE question:!:
After all, no one insists that you give answers to them, everyone understands that you are an extremely busy person ...
But Dima, being a co-organizer of the NPK, can give answers to them:!::!::!:
Although ... if these questions constitute a trade secret, then of course the reluctance to answer them is understandable

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

It turns out her "ignored" EVERYTHING? And here are colleagues from the VAChD? And who of the Ukrainian detectives was at this conference, are they still not members of the VAChD? It’s just that the conference didn’t turn out to be NPK, but just a scientific conference, so this is a question for the organizers, and not for each other.

This, Roma, is called leading questions.

Cool working version.
Thank you Sergey Alekseevich!

 

[abbat]

Kostyaayayayaya, even you can’t talk to me

I do not engage in the implementation of unrealistic plans.
To blurt you is empty chores.
You can chat ... only you, Roma ...

: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:
Kostya:!::!::!::!:
We will ever hear the "TRUTH from the organizers" (c):?::?:

 

[abbat]

It turns out her "ignored" EVERYTHING? And here are colleagues from the VAChD? And who of the Ukrainian detectives was at this conference, are they still not members of the VAChD? It’s just that the conference didn’t turn out to be NPK, but just a scientific conference, so this is a question for the organizers, and not for each other.

This, Roma, is called leading questions.

Cool working version.
Thank you Sergey Alekseevich!

Kostya "leading questions" and "imposing opinions" are different terms and different techniques ... although they belong to the same technology

BUT this is not about that:!::!::!:
We heard the “TRUTH from VACHD” (c), but the “TRUTH from the organizers” (c) was not voiced

But in general, Kostya slightly surprised me that you introduced the concept of "TWO TRUTH" ...
There can be two or more points of view, and the TRUTH is TRUE always the same:!::!::!:
And we will not know this Truth until we hear answers from the organizers