Uluslararası Bilimsel ve Pratik Konferans (Ukrayna).

[abbat]

Are you setting me a forfeit?

I refresh the memories of the reasons for my next entrance: P: D

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

No need to refresh my memories with your reminder, Roma!
I am one year younger than you.

Let them come here to chat, if you want it yourself ...
I forcibly dragged you to the Forum against your will, Roman?
They don’t want to - not deadly: everyone chooses for himself where he is comfortable to communicate.
If you hadn’t come here for the fourth time, the Forum would not have collapsed, right?
I did not register for SISYA and I do not want to do this in the future.
Which MOD has the opportunity to communicate there - a flag in hand and good luck in communication!
Moreover, we already have the experience of DEMOCRATIC communication on SISIS ...

I do not refuse my words.

 

[abbat]

No need to refresh my memories with your reminder, Roma!
I am one year younger than you.

Let them come here to chat, if you want it yourself ...
I forcibly dragged you to the Forum against your will, Roman?
They don’t want to - not deadly: everyone chooses for himself where he is comfortable to communicate.
If you hadn’t come here for the fourth time, the Forum would not have collapsed, right?
I did not register for SISYA and I do not want to do this in the future.
Which MOD has the opportunity to communicate there - a flag in hand and good luck in communication!
Moreover, we already have the experience of DEMOCRATIC communication on SISIS ...

I do not refuse my words.

We are not talking about Kostya:!::!::!:
The topic is actually about it

I repeat the questions
- on what conditions (initially) was proposed participation (co-organization) in the CDD;
- percentage of announced participants to real presence;
- was Znikin present at the NPK ...
- Did Harchenko really say what was published in net;

 

[abbat]

I want to ask the members of the forum
- Is the timeliness of the event,
a compelling reason for moving this event to a more convenient, “operational” aspect:?:
- How often did an event held out of time jeopardize
the whole planned scheme:?:

 

[Евгений СБ]

I want to ask the members of the forum
- Is the timeliness of the event,
a compelling reason for moving this event to a more convenient, “operational” aspect:?:

In fact yes. But for this there must be an understanding that it is untimely.

- How often did an event held out of time jeopardize
the whole planned scheme:?:

Roma, maybe the question is not quite correctly posed? It would be more correct, probably like this: Does it jeopardize a failure, an untimely event, to achieve the goal in implementing a certain strategy?
The answer is yes. But I repeat that for this you need to be aware of this very strategy. And most importantly, support her. After all, there may be another opinion.

 

[abbat]

I want to ask the members of the forum
- Is the timeliness of the event,
a compelling reason for moving this event to a more convenient, “operational” aspect:?:

In fact yes. But for this there must be an understanding that it is untimely.

- How often did an event held out of time jeopardize
the whole planned scheme:?:

Roma, maybe the question is not quite correctly posed? Perhaps it would be more correct: Does the disruption of an untimely event endanger the achievement of the goal in pursuing a specific strategy?
The answer is yes. But I repeat that for this you need to be aware of this very strategy. And most importantly, support her. After all, there may be another opinion.

Golden words, Zhenya:!:
I absolutely agree with you:!:
Your edition is clearer ... and the answer is also:!::!:: D

 

[abbat]

So to summarize ...
in chronology
Here began a “stormy discussion” on January 27th

SKF Budaev and partners. Tula. »Jan 27, 2013 7:23 AM
STEVE wrote: WESTERN is furious.

Of course: the opinion of "venerable practitioners" of private investigation in Ukraine diverged from the opinion of Ukrainian scientists:
https://aupd.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&p=8283#p8283
Professors and associate professors did not consult with the VAChD.

Andrey Zakharov »Jan 28, 2013 8:14 AM
Yeah ... The very strange position of the VAChD ... Although some of the problems that were discussed at the Folrum very strongly "hurt" our Ukrainian friends ... Especially the position expressed by scientists on the illegality of the BH in Ukraine (in the aspect of the Law on Horde) ... We look forward to discussing the issues raised at this conference ...

The forum users have a question

SKF Budaev and partners. Tula. Yesterday, 06:34

I have one small question.
Do you personally know the true reasons for the NOVEMBER, UNANIMOUS, COLLECTIVE refusal to participate in the Conference of the ICAA members?
I know that you are not a member of this association.
Maybe it will not be convenient for you to answer the question posed by me?
I do not believe in the official version of the refusal distributed by the leadership of the VAChD.

to which an intelligible answer was given

Today, 09:11
The reasons:
- there is a plan of the VAChD activity on the formation of the foundations of a draft law on NPV, its promotion and the participation of all in this. This plan is not internal to the VAChD and the conduct of the CDD in February, and even at the level of one city - all were recognized as premature, not of practical use, but for some parameters, and with possible harm. With this in mind, a refusal was given not only to the organization, but also to participate.

- A lot of effort, time and energy is now spent on the formation of amendments to the bill. All members of the ACID and other colleagues involved in this process, scholars, lawyers, and other specialists of the all-Ukrainian level know that the “backbone” is ready, it is being filled, examined and polished.

Unfortunately, intelligible answers from NPK organizers to these questions

I repeat the questions
- on what conditions (initially) was proposed participation (co-organization) in the CDD;
- percentage of announced participants to real presence;
- was Znikin present at the NPK ...
- Did Harchenko really say what was published in net;

never followed

The debate lasted for FIVE days, took 13 pages of the forum, but still did not draw answers from the organizers of the CDD to simple questions,

Given the foregoing, it should be assumed that organizers have no answers to questions .
The futility of further chatter compels a decision to cease further participation in the “discussions”.

Thank you all for your attention

Ready to discuss other topics

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Roma, he just returned to the office, and what I see: apparently it’s very bad with colleagues' orders, since they have been talking all day in this way. Roma, do you think that having received your questions, the organizers should undermine and rush to answer them? I see no reason. I think and hope that when the conference materials are ready they will be laid out in the public domain, but everything has its time. In my opinion, exchanging smiles and reproaches during working hours is not a noble occupation for busy people.

 

[Юридическая Компания Лидер]

Roma, he just returned to the office, and what I see: apparently it’s very bad with colleagues' orders, since they have been talking all day in this way. Roma, do you think that having received your questions, the organizers should undermine and rush to answer them? I see no reason. I think and hope that when the conference materials are ready they will be laid out in the public domain, but everything has its time. In my opinion, exchanging smiles and reproaches during working hours is not a noble occupation for busy people.

I completely agree with Kirill, when the first information about the Conference appeared, I thought to express my opinion, when I went in once again I saw this uninterrupted "tyagomotin", the desire to comment was lost. Nothing to do with the Lord detectives.

 

[Юридическая Компания Лидер]

Detectives of all countries, unite!

In order to actively participate in the adoption of the NPV Law in Ukraine, it is necessary, on the contrary, to attend such conferences, and not to evade or ignore them.
Nobody urges anyone to agree with the results of such conferences or not to express their fundamental objections to specific statements of opponents. Deliver the Lord!
I always advocate consistency in action.
As if, the logic is completely absent: we are very concerned about the speedy adoption of the Law, but we will not go to a scientific conference on this topic. What for? We are smart, and there, some fools will gather ...
As in a well-known saying: to spite my mother I will frostbite my ears!

GOLD WORDS.