Is it possible to attach information from a private detective to a criminal case

[Trigger]

What a heated discussion the answer caused, it would seem to be a simple question.

I will try to expand my question a little.
In my amateurish opinion, such cases (phone divorce) are disclosed in a week. There is a recording of a telephone conversation, a phone number, a recording of a criminal from 2 cameras.

He came to the police department 1.5 hours after the crime, wrote a statement. Talked with the opera. Surprised that the video from the entrance cameras they have only online, there is no archive (according to the opera).
The next day he transferred the recording of the telephone conversation to CD and ordered an archive from video cameras in Mosgortelecom. The opera offered 2 options: as a consequence or as an inquiry, said that the inquiry was faster in time. Excited UD, transferred to the inquiry. Video archive so for 2 weeks and no one went to pick up
When asked when there will be infa by phone number, she said that it is through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, through the court it is very difficult and long. 1-3 months. You understand that the later information is received, the more difficult it will be to find.

I'm interested in all the ways to speed up the process, including receiving information from a private detective.

It doesn’t matter - establish the owner or get a printout. There is only one scheme - say that I received the information, I can’t open the source, please check my information. As a rule, checking information takes much less time than receiving it

Well, let's say I can talk to a girl in a Beeline office and she will provide me with information. I see 2 developments:
- these are guesses not confirmed by facts (unless I name the source)
- the information received is illegal (if I say how)
Then there will be the same song "through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, through the court it is very difficult and long. 1-3 months."

If there is a criminal case, there is no problem at all to identify the subscriber number, the investigator writes a letter to the officers who provide operational support for the case, they establish this within a couple of hours and provide the investigator with a response as a response to a separate criminal case order, you do not need to leave the office. In case of further need, the investigator can obtain this information from the mobile operator upon request. But it often happens that the number is registered to a front man

More? What kind of "employees providing operational support"? Department "K" BSTM? According to the interrogator, the number quickly makes its way only in the killings, they may not respond to small things at all (there is a lot of work, there are not enough people).

 

[Турабян Владимир]

I HAVE AN IMPRESSION THAT THE RUSSIAN JUDGES JUDGES DO NOT HAVE ANY INTERESTS IN THE ORIGIN OF DOCUMENTS AND HOW THEY INCLUDE THEM IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE APPEAL!
BY THE LORD BUDAEV, IT IS COMPLETELY FULLY RELATED TO THE ARTICLE OF THE CPC!

 

[Детектив-Юг]

Dear Trigger (initiator of the topic), initially your question is nothing!
And now your question will remain unanswered, due to the complete uncertainty of where you live, who you are and what you are, what damage you have suffered, and what ultimately you want to receive.

Is it possible to attach information from a private detective to a criminal case?

Good day.
My close relatives are victims of 159. The case was opened. There is a mobile number. The police say that data can only be obtained by court order and within 1-3 months.
Is there an opportunity to obtain information so that it can be attached to the case file?

I have a parrot in the office pronouncing more words on the case.

What a heated discussion the answer caused, it would seem to be a simple question.

I will try to expand my question a little.
In my amateurish opinion, such cases (phone divorce) are disclosed in a week. There is a recording of a telephone conversation, a phone number, a recording of a criminal from 2 cameras.

He came to the police department 1.5 hours after the crime, wrote a statement. Talked with the opera. Surprised that the video from the entrance cameras they have only online, there is no archive (according to the opera).
The next day he transferred the recording of the telephone conversation to CD and ordered an archive from video cameras in Mosgortelecom. The opera offered 2 options: as a consequence or as an inquiry, said that the inquiry was faster in time. Excited UD, transferred to the inquiry. Video archive so for 2 weeks and no one went to pick up
When asked when there will be infa by phone number, she said that it is through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, through the court it is very difficult and long. 1-3 months. You understand that the later information is received, the more difficult it will be to find.

I'm interested in all the ways to speed up the process, including receiving information from a private detective.

This is not an answer but a discussion of the legalization of materials, or gossip, obtained on the side and their introduction to the case.

The trigger for you in the police department everyone answered the process has begun, everyone is looking for your offender!
Free advice: hire a detective and if he is interested in this topic, he will probably find you a swindler, he will legalize everything and solve all your questions.

 

[Детектив Чита]

Dear Trigger!
Please tell me, what are you addressing here for? In my opinion, they gave you comprehensive answers to all questions. Further information you provide about anything. It seems that you want to get advice for free, and then use them somewhere. Do not try to save money, hire a competent detective in your area!
You can use this site to search for a detective.

 

[Роберт]

And what kind of nonsense about three months?

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

I'm interested in all the ways to speed up the process, including receiving information from a private detective.

Detective agency. Mongoose. Ufa wrote (a):
It doesn’t matter - establish the owner or get a printout. There is only one scheme - say that I received the information, I can’t open the source, please check my information. As a rule, checking information takes much less time than receiving it

Well, let's say I can talk to a girl in a Beeline office and she will provide me with information. I see 2 developments:
- these are guesses not confirmed by facts (unless I name the source)
- the information received is illegal (if I say how)
Then there will be the same song "through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, through the court it is very difficult and long. 1-3 months."

YOU COMPLETE DIFFERENT THINGS: YOU PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR WHICH YOU CANNOT PROVIDE THE SOURCE OF ITS RECEIPT FOR CERTAIN REASONS. POLICE IS OBLIGED TO CHECK YOUR INFORMATION.

Elena Rjhjktdf wrote:
If there is a criminal case, there is no problem at all to identify the subscriber number, the investigator writes a letter to the officers who provide operational support for the case, they establish this within a couple of hours and provide the investigator with a response as a response to a separate criminal case order, you do not need to leave the office. In case of further need, the investigator can obtain this information from the mobile operator upon request. But it often happens that the number is registered to a front man

More? What kind of "employees providing operational support"? Department "K" BSTM? According to the interrogator, the number quickly makes its way only in the killings, they may not respond to small things at all (there is a lot of work, there are not enough people).

CARRYING OUT THE OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF THE CRIMINAL CASE ONLY THE OPENING OF THE CRIMINAL RESEARCH OR BEP, WHICH ALSO BASED ON THE COURT DECISION, WRITE THE JOB IN “BLOCKING” THE NUMBERS ALREADY ALREADY ANSWEREDLY AFTER SOME OPEN X HOURS ".. OPERA DEPARTMENT" K "OR SIMPLY BSTM ONLY ONLY PROVIDE THE RELEVANT INFU.O

 

[Роберт]

I'm interested in all the ways to speed up the process, including receiving information from a private detective.

Detective agency. Mongoose. Ufa wrote (a):
It doesn’t matter - establish the owner or get a printout. There is only one scheme - say that I received the information, I can’t open the source, please check my information. As a rule, checking information takes much less time than receiving it

Well, let's say I can talk to a girl in a Beeline office and she will provide me with information. I see 2 developments:
- these are guesses not confirmed by facts (unless I name the source)
- the information received is illegal (if I say how)
Then there will be the same song "through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, through the court it is very difficult and long. 1-3 months."

YOU COMPLETE DIFFERENT THINGS: YOU PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR WHICH YOU CANNOT PROVIDE THE SOURCE OF ITS RECEIPT FOR CERTAIN REASONS. POLICE IS OBLIGED TO CHECK YOUR INFORMATION.

Elena Rjhjktdf wrote:
If there is a criminal case, there is no problem at all to identify the subscriber number, the investigator writes a letter to the officers who provide operational support for the case, they establish this within a couple of hours and provide the investigator with a response as a response to a separate criminal case order, you do not need to leave the office. In case of further need, the investigator can obtain this information from the mobile operator upon request. But it often happens that the number is registered to a front man

More? What kind of "employees providing operational support"? Department "K" BSTM? According to the interrogator, the number quickly makes its way only in the killings, they may not respond to small things at all (there is a lot of work, there are not enough people).

CARRYING OUT THE OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF THE CRIMINAL CASE ONLY THE OPENING OF THE CRIMINAL RESEARCH OR BEP, WHICH ALSO BASED ON THE COURT DECISION, WRITE THE JOB IN “BLOCKING” THE NUMBERS ALREADY ALREADY ANSWEREDLY AFTER SOME OPEN X HOURS ".. OPERA DEPARTMENT" K "OR SIMPLY BSTM ONLY ONLY PROVIDE THE RELEVANT INFU.O

You're scaring me!!! Siberia is probably a special country in Russia. Own customs, own rules.

 

[Роберт]

I spent 5 minutes to break through the phone, to find out in another region 45 minutes (when I served). I probably live on the moon, like Matushkin (in St. Petersburg), but the topic is not clear to me. What problems can be here I do not know. And there is no secret! This is an open secret: D

 

[Арсен]

I HAVE AN IMPRESSION THAT THE RUSSIAN JUDGES JUDGES DO NOT HAVE ANY INTERESTS IN THE ORIGIN OF DOCUMENTS AND HOW THEY INCLUDE THEM IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE APPEAL!
BY THE LORD BUDAEV, IT IS COMPLETELY FULLY RELATED TO THE ARTICLE OF THE CPC!

You are absolutely right Vladimir Levonovich! Russian judges are interested in the origin of the information when they were paid and
it is necessary to dismiss a person’s responsibility, then they begin to be interested in when, by whom, and under what circumstances
this information is obtained. And this is not only in Russia, it is in all countries of the former Soviet Union. What do you want if the judge falls asleep
during the trial, what do you want if the judge, when deciding, consults the clerk.
1. As long as we have operatives, investigators, except for holding a pen in their hands do not have any skills, the investigation will not be of high quality.
2. While our corrupt judges, taking advantage of their independence and the opportunity to rely on their inner conviction, will be biased,
with interest and biased to evaluate evidence and make decisions, we never have competent, high-quality and
there will be no fair justice.

 

[Kuznecov.Igorj]

Hello dear gentlemen detectives! I write a little, but practically read everything. And now it’s just become annoying. Gentlemen, you know that there is a criminal procedural law, read it and you won’t have a question if you can play with the settled sandbox. One gets the impression that dear gentlemen detectives, although they worked in a system or office, they did not encounter jurisprudence. You can discuss the question in which hand to hold the spoon correctly when eating fried meat. But we are working on the basis of the legislation of the country that issued us the license (certificate). So is it really difficult to look into the law and get acquainted with it. Understand that third parties can read our correspondence. So what is their opinion about you. Sorry if I offended anyone. Did not want. But sometimes it’s painful to read detective questions. Sincerely, Igor, Riga.