Is it possible to attach information from a private detective to a criminal case

[Роберт]

Well, I don’t know how in Sochi, but in St. Petersburg they try to approach in principle. The exceptions are arbitration for billions of bucks, yes, there is a real war of money !!!

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

I don’t think Arsen that on such matters someone will give something to the judge’s pocket, and the prosecutor doesn’t happen at such trials, but basically you're right. And do not take Igor’s summer resident into account, “the dog barks, the wind carries”

 

[Арсен]

I don’t think Arsen that on such matters someone will give something to the judge’s pocket, and the prosecutor doesn’t happen at such trials, but basically you're right. And do not take Igor’s summer resident into account, “the dog barks, the wind carries”

Vitaly, I’m talking about our judicial system in general. And in this situation, you have to collect evidence in good faith, as
no financial or material interests. And Igor looks at business with a simple, primitive look.

 

[Kuznecov.Igorj]

Hello. The question is very clearly posed and one should not specify who the plaintiff is and who has what hand. Give a specific answer, because the person who asked the question does not ask you to clarify the article of the law. I believe the answer should be simple and clear. It is possible and necessary to attach the information of a private detective to a criminal or any other case, if there is reason for this. It’s just that Nastya needs to conclude an agreement with BH at the place of residence, and if the detective has brains in place, then he will draw up the legal side of the issue himself. No one will let you establish video registration in the apartment, and what gentlemen, in the front door you also need someone to ask permission. ZHEKU to sneeze at this. Or it’s hard to walk around the neighbors and accept full explanations about what is happening in this apartment. I understand that rewriting an article of civil law is much easier. Is it really hard to go after mom when she comes out with the baby and see what she buys and where. What if alcohol will be purchased, or products that the baby is simply not recommended to feed. Record each step of the mother and correctly arrange photo tables. This is evidence. And the public can file a lawsuit about the deprivation of parental rights, if it’s no longer for anyone and everything is correctly executed in a procedural manner.

 

[Kuznecov.Igorj]

For Asters. I will take note of your recommendations and I will definitely accept valerian. As for saliva spray, for your information I’m not a dog and I consider your answer offensive to myself. You should learn a little courtesy. Wow offended, offered to read the law. Let me know your address, I will send you the RF Procedure Law. You can buy it in Latvia. You out of a fly inflated an elephant. Apparently you can’t do anything else.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Probably Igor can’t agree with you on many points ... Regarding the filing of a lawsuit, the deprivation of parental rights is doomed to failure (based on the norms of the current family and civil legislation of the Russian Federation in a particular situation) ... Regarding the collection of information in the framework of a civil case in a lawsuit on determining the procedure for raising a child, only parents can be parties ... On the issue of simply collecting information confirming the antisocial behavior of parents, there are special units, in particular ONE (UMVD). KDN, which are able to collect such information and sources of information defined by the judicial practice and regulatory documents (in particular, the court adopts acts of inspection of the child’s living conditions at the place of actual residence, documents characterizing the parents, etc. as evidence.) The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation generalized the judicial practice and issued an appropriate resolution of the Plenum, which clearly indicates the information, which can be the basis of the dock For such cases, there is an indication of the need for various examinations, etc. So in order to draw any conclusions and make recommendations, you need to know the norms of national legislation in detail, and you Igor live in another state and apparently are not familiar with the norms of our Russian legislation governing such issues ...

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Igor, I explain to you as a practitioner. That the evidence of the BH, that any other witness has the same legal force, does not have the BH any status and rights either, only obligations.
The video was put into the apartment several times, with the permission of course, one of the owners, but it doesn’t formulate this and the court does not say about it, the owners put it all, there is a violation of the rights of the child and it does not matter how it is obtained. The fact that you write about products and videos in the front door is complete nonsense, this is not a fact or evidence. I get the impression that you have no where else to clever, no one listens ... Alas, this resource will be the same with you. I agree with Arsen "And Igor looks at things with a simple, primitive look"

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

For Asters. I will take note of your recommendations and I will definitely accept valerian. As for saliva spray, for your information I’m not a dog and I consider your answer offensive to myself. You should learn a little courtesy. Wow offended, offered to read the law. Let me know your address, I will send you the RF Procedure Law. You can buy it in Latvia. You out of a fly inflated an elephant. Apparently you can’t do anything else.

I can’t calmly communicate with primitive-minded, not very smart people, do not seek Igor ...

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Regarding the collection of information regarding the antisocial behavior of one of the parents and the installation of video recorders in the apartment of the facility, of course you can agree with Vitaly that the video recorder can be installed by one of the parents (not prohibited by the Law), as well as the use of child monitoring systems, the installation of audio equipment is established by the parents ... The participation of the BH in this case is just consultation (as a specialist, where it is better to install, etc.) ... In this case, there are no violations of the Law by the BH ... Unless, of course, all the equipment belongs to the parents (important factor), but is not transferred for use from the BH (This should probably be paid special attention ...). And all the information obtained as a result of the use of these technical means by the parents (not BH) can naturally be transferred to the court and attached to a civil case by the parents themselves (persons who installed this equipment) ... In this case, there is no violation of the Law ...

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Finally . And I thought everyone would deny the obvious and refer to the Code of Criminal Procedure: D: D: D