Competitive intelligence in the Premier League business

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

You Dear, so far except ... the proposed products have not posted anything ..

Will the dear don not deign to show what I offered him to buy from me? I am extremely interested in understanding the psychology of people who call themselves practitioners and detectives and make such statements.
Please be specific to the link - where and what of my products I recommended you purchase.
I'm waiting.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Well, regarding the lack (or insufficiency) of theoretical training among the practitioners present at the Forum, it’s you who’s in vain ... Some people have much more work experience, including using theoretical knowledge, of various kinds ... Just these people are so educated that they do not boast about it ... Something like this ....

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Well, regarding the lack (or insufficiency) of theoretical training among the practitioners present at the Forum, it’s you who’s in vain ... Some people have much more work experience, including using theoretical knowledge, of various kinds ... Just these people are so educated that they do not boast about it ... Something like this ....

Did I say something about the lack of theoretical training? I asked questions, and very specific ones. Clarifications for.

Well, as for whether to "boast" or "do not boast" - it seems to me that this term is not entirely successful. Here, there is a conversation on the case. It concerns, inter alia, questions of theory. And what do I see? Someone (I admit that a very professionally competent person, not a question) suddenly calls me a theorist and says that I, it turns out, suggested he buy some of my products. And also that I have not shown anything from practice here.

You know, I inevitably have questions for such a person. Of course, I ask them. I’m a straightforward person - if I don’t understand something, I ask, and if I understand, I explain.

So let's not get emotional, but talk about the facts. Not “boasting” and not “modest” (a trait is strange for an entrepreneur, but oh well), but specifically.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

And you cannot effectively counter competitive intelligence. She takes the information legally. A working company always leaves traces, but you will not transfer people to the barracks. It is possible to complicate the work of the Kyrgyz Republic, but it is impossible to completely impede it completely. Yes, probably, and it is not necessary to interfere completely. There is no point.

I do not agree a bit, because in the confrontation of 2 people, states, systems and. etc., other things being equal, the winner is the one who uses not only legal methods of work, unlike the other side, which uses legal, legal methods of work. That's life.

Igor, we are again talking about different things, you are theorists are businessmen, and we are practitioners and businessmen too.

Dear, what makes you think that I am a theorist, if not a secret? From the fact that I am more or less versed in theory? Do you seriously believe that practicing practice without knowledge of theory is high valor?
Please, indicate yourself then - by whom, when and where did you work in relation to law enforcement or the Kyrgyz Republic?

I am surprised to read that some of those present turn out to be inconspicuous, modest, condemn commercialization, and do not want to make more money. No, it happens, of course. There are, for example, ardent statesmen or even unrefined altruists. Just how does this fit in with the registration of an individual ENTREPRENEUR? And is it a mess in the country when such a dissonance is observed?

You have already been told about, to put it mildly, the imperfection of the Law, therefore, BH, working on complex matters, violates the Law in one way or another. Why shine?

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Evgeny Yushchuk wrote (a):
Detective South wrote:
Igor, we are again talking about different things, you are theorists are businessmen, and we are practitioners and businessmen too.

Dear, what makes you think that I am a theorist, if not a secret? From the fact that I am more or less versed in theory? Do you seriously believe that practicing practice without knowledge of theory is high valor?
Please, indicate yourself then - by whom, when and where did you work in relation to law enforcement or the Kyrgyz Republic?

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Maybe we will end the discussion? Moreover, at times it begins to go beyond the framework of correct expressions. Thanks to Andrei Matushkin for new people, for interesting topics, but in my opinion there has recently been a bust with the Kyrgyz Republic, because this is still a forum for combining PRIVATE DETECTIVES, and not the Kyrgyz specialists. Moreover, the work of the BH by definition is much wider and deeper in the field of application than the specialist of the Kyrgyz Republic, because any work of the black hole can be described as "collection of information ...". Thank you, Eugene, maybe you will give some links to sites and prch. for those who are interested in this topic? thank

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

You have already been told about, to put it mildly, the imperfection of the Law, therefore, BH, working on complex matters, violates the Law in one way or another. Why shine?

If. You told me about this. And others spoke diametrically opposite to me about this. For example, a Private Detective License implies exclusively legal actions. Not if you are working with a violation of the criminal code - there are no questions, of course, you have to hide. Only then I don’t understand another thing - why did you get the License and registered IP?

... in my opinion, busting with the Kyrgyz Republic has recently arisen, because this is still a forum for combining PRIVATE DETECTIVES, and not the Kyrgyz specialists. Moreover, the work of the BH by definition is much wider and deeper in the field of application than the specialist of the Kyrgyz Republic, because any work of the black hole can be described as "collection of information ...". Thank you, Eugene, maybe you will give some links to sites and prch. for those who are interested in this topic? thank

May be.
True, I don’t understand how sorting out with the Kyrgyz Republic can be in a separate section “Intelligence in the field of business”, which was created for it, and why you go to it if you do not need it. But maybe you are right. Let's listen to the opinions of people.

 

[Гудимов Анатолий Геннадиевич]

May be.
True, I don’t understand how sorting out with the Kyrgyz Republic can be in a separate section “Intelligence in the field of business”, which was created for it, and why you go to it if you do not need it. But maybe you are right. Let's listen to the opinions of people.

I support Eugene, a separate topic and for many interesting for its methods and approaches to obtaining information.
Personally, I like that life is raging on the forum, the main thing is not to cross the line of correctness and listen not only to yourself, but also to your interlocutors (in my opinion there are no opponents here).

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

I have already said, and again I repeat, on the forum and in our Association there are many professionals, detectives, polygraph examiners, SB-kov, KR-kov, consulting companies, etc. Let's respect the opinion of professionals in each type of activity above.
Everyone has their own choice. To impose one’s picture of the world emotionally, based on one’s inner desires, is an ungrateful affair, and it is necessary to prove one’s rightness by justifying it.
Nobody forbids bringing experts to the forum in areas close to our specifics. We will learn from specialists and develop our comfort zone. Now they are specialists in the Kyrgyz Republic, tomorrow there may be others, the third day after tomorrow ... We must go forward, develop ourselves and develop the resource.
Evgeny! I am glad that you are here, have learned a lot lately, and continue to learn from you.

 

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

You have already been told about, to put it mildly, the imperfection of the Law, therefore, BH, working on complex matters, violates the Law in one way or another. Why shine?

If. You told me about this. And others spoke diametrically opposite to me about this. For example, a Private Detective License implies exclusively legal actions. Not if you are working with a violation of the criminal code - there are no questions, of course, you have to hide. Only then I don’t understand another thing - why did you get the License and registered IP?

... in my opinion, busting with the Kyrgyz Republic has recently arisen, because this is still a forum for combining PRIVATE DETECTIVES, and not the Kyrgyz specialists. Moreover, the work of BH by definition is much wider and deeper in scope than the specialist of the Kyrgyz Republic, because any work of the black hole can be described as "collection of information ...". Thank you, Eugene, maybe you will give some links to sites and prch. for those who are interested in this topic? thank

May be.
True, I don’t understand how sorting out with the Kyrgyz Republic can be in a separate section “Intelligence in the field of business”, which was created for it, and why you go to it if you do not need it. But maybe you are right. Let's listen to the opinions of people.

1. I got a license to try to work legally. 2. Messages come to me in PM, that's why I react. 3. Unfortunately, I have to conclude that you answer only those questions that you can answer at a given time, but you do not answer the other questions posed, you ignore them. They did not respond to my request. Having a certain experience in detective activity, both in the field of state detective work and in private detective activity, I am compelled to state, unfortunately, the following fact: you, not answering questions directly posed to you, give us, in particular, to assume that you are working on the "older brothers" to collect information on detectives. I am finishing my participation in this topic, for which I urge the rest of the MOD members, private detectives. But I give you the opportunity to connect me to the discussion of this topic only subject to an answer to the questions I have asked you earlier. Otherwise, I stop communicating, for which I urge others. Thank.