Question to the KR

[Андрей Захаров]

I see ... The lack of a direct answer is also the answer .... Thanks ...

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

I see ... The lack of a direct answer is also the answer .... Thanks ...

A First gave you a detailed answer, on the basis of which you could draw your own conclusions.
Then, at your request, he gave an exhaustive direct answer.

Apparently, there can be no other.
However, if he does not suit you - you can search for yourself. You have all the data for this, including the outcome of discussions with specialists. This is, therefore, a consolidated opinion.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Understood ... Thank you ... I can not agree or disagree with the answer (with regards to suits or does not suit) ... The answer to the question either is or is not ... The answer is the answer ... Especially in Consolidated Opinion ...

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Andrei, you also find yourself lacking abstract thinking: lol:

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Andrei, you also find yourself lacking abstract thinking: lol:

You are wrong. In this case, the answer is just very specific. And short - there is nothing to be confused about:

The competence of a private detective can be attributed to any market research activity not expressly prohibited by law, which is part of his work carried out "for the purpose of investigation" (as interpreted by the NPV Law).

Thus, there are only two criteria:

1. The market is being studied by a private detective for the purposes of investigation
2. A set of actions committed by a private detective, while not prohibited by law.

Of course, the license of a private detective does not deprive him of his civil rights, so he can study the market and not for search purposes. But exactly the same thing can be done by any other citizen.

PS And let's, if possible, will not arrange another squabble. Do not make me regret that I gave a link to specific material, but did not remain silent when I saw the question of respected Andrei. Thank you in advance.

 

[Степан Петрович]

Andrei, you also find yourself lacking abstract thinking: lol:

You are wrong. In this case, the answer is just very specific. And short - there is nothing to be confused about:

Of course, the license of a private detective does not deprive him of his civil rights, so he can study the market and not for search purposes. But exactly the same thing can be done by any other citizen.

So it turns out a private detective’s license is not needed, you just need to be a citizen.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

So it turns out a private detective’s license is not needed, you just need to be a citizen.

If you are engaged in detective work, you need it. If you are not involved in detective work - not needed.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Again:

The competence of a private detective can be attributed any straight not prohibited by law market research activities, as part of its ongoing work "for the purpose of investigation" (as interpreted by the NPV Law).

All.

BECAUSE:

The separation between ORM and non-ORM is carried out exclusively by subject. Those,. if the opera is talking and for the purposes of the ARD, it is ORM. And if not operas (or operas, but on personal matters) are talking, not OPM. All.
Hence the conclusion: even if Sbshnik, Krshchik or BH is listening, for example, on the phone, he does not carry out ORM, but stupidly commits a crime. If the opera speaks with a citizen for the purposes of the ARD - a survey, not for operas and not for the purposes of the ARD - just a conversation, or at worst, an explanation in accordance with the Labor Code and other laws.
Thus, KRSchik, Sbshnik, BH may not have to think about what he is doing, the main thing is not to do what is directly indicated in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

 

[Степан Петрович]

So it turns out a private detective’s license is not needed, you just need to be a citizen.

If you are engaged in detective work, you need it. If you are not involved in detective work - not needed.

In short, if you pretend to be a hose, no license is necessary.
Good approach, no taxes and no bugs.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

In short, if you pretend to be a hose, no license is necessary.
Good approach, no taxes and no bunting.

Let's talk in legal terms.

1. Taxes are paid according to the Tax Code and are not related to licensing.

2. The license of a private detective not only imposes obligations, but also gives rights. At a minimum, such:

- engage in detectives
- write documents of procedural significance.

If you do not have a private detective license, you cannot legally investigate and cannot write documents of procedural significance.

What's not clear?