question

[Anonymous]

In order to maintain a position of a freelance employee and issue a certificate, what an internal order should look like. Regards, Stanislav.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Hello, Stanislav. What did you mean?

 

[Частный детектив. Хабаровск.]

working on coal. the case needs to be classified as a witness, the opera couldn’t talk, I chatted, but he’s afraid, the investigation doesn’t want to, or is also afraid to secret him, because in relation to the prosecutor’s employee, in connection with this QUESTION: do I have the right to interview him not using his actual data, but only a pseudonym, if - YES, then with what normative act should I regulate activities ....? if - NO, then everything is clear ... There was such a practice with you or your colleagues

thankful in advance, please do not delay the answer, it’s on already ...
Regards BH Eugene

 

[Anonymous]

You, my friend, in the framework of the corner. you have no right to interrogate anyone at all. The interrogation of a witness is clearly regulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, therefore I strongly recommend that you study the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation thoroughly, and especially its chapters, which regulate the production of procedural actions to collect evidence and the rights of the parties to the case during their conduct. Your initiative will lead you to only one thing: the investigator will cease to perceive you as a specialist, and will treat you accordingly, and the prosecutor will be prosecuted. case, only thank you for ruining the evidence ...

 

[Частный детектив. Хабаровск.]

I work with a lawyer who represents the interests of the victim, I’m not directly interposing with this lawyer and the witness, and the question arose about not keeping the operatives secret, the investigator is afraid that the lawyer may also interview the witness, or then call me to court ... but I’d like to record it myself, he agrees that’s what I propose

 

[Anonymous]

Well, that means you both never read the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation at all, therefore the investigator is afraid of your witnesses, and not vice versa. I don’t comment on these posts anymore, teach together with a lawyer of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. : lol:

 

[ДНК]

Well, that means you both never read the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation at all, therefore the investigator is afraid of your witnesses, and not vice versa. I don’t comment on these posts anymore, teach together with a lawyer of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. : lol:

Andrei Vadimovich, well, what are you smarting, you better help with advice than scolding .... most likely the investigator didn’t read the Code of Criminal Procedure, that’s why he’s afraid of everything, especially the case with the prosecutor.
Let the lawyer write a statement addressed to the head of the investigation unit that there is a witness in the case who is ready to testify provided that his data are closed. Wait for an official response. If the answer is no, appeal it to the prosecutor’s office overseeing the case .... and even if the corruption case (and not a thread of an accident involving the prosecutor), try to “pull” on the operational support of the local FSB officers, rather than operas from the ground. ..

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Yes, probably Dmitry’s advice can help in this matter. According to the FSB officers, I think that they don’t need to be pulled, they will take it with great pleasure. In Moscow, in any case, this is so - just give the texture.
Andrei, what a manner to give an answer to a person who came from the height of Olympus. After all, a man of advice asks. And I probably missed something in the legislation. What, polling as a method of BH operation is already prohibited? :?

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

working on coal. the case needs to be classified as a witness, the opera couldn’t talk, I chatted, but he’s afraid, the investigation doesn’t want to, or is also afraid to secret him, because in relation to the prosecutor’s employee, in connection with this QUESTION: do I have the right to interview him not using his actual data, but only a pseudonym, if - YES, then with what normative act should I regulate activities ....? if - NO, then everything is clear ... There was such a practice with you or your colleagues

thankful in advance, please do not delay the answer, it’s on already ...
Regards BH Eugene

Hello, Eugene !!
Sorry, it's a little difficult for me to perceive the context of your post ...
Therefore, if something is not correctly understood - you correct me!
1. There is a witness whom you found ...
2. The witness is afraid to go to the investigator and further to the court ...
3. You want the witness to be questioned under false lips. data
and testified in court in closed session ...

p. 1. No response required ...
p.p. 2.3. The investigator is not able to legend witness - he has
there is simply no legal basis ... Opera has the right to legend
operational development stage - you have a situation in the investigation stage of UD.

Those. - Your witness cannot be interrogated under a pseudonym and closed
there will be no court hearing !!

Colleagues advised you to apply correctly (at least consult)
to the committee members !!
I would also advise you to connect the press, BUT it needs to be done
very neat !!!! My advice is waltzing on very slippery and thin
ice !!!!! Without sufficient experience with the press, playing these "games" is not
safely!

Look like that's it....
Yours faithfully

 

[ДНК]

No, Roman, an investigator can classify a witness with one of his decisions (+ a substantiated statement from a witness addressed to the head of the Investigative Committee) and then interrogate him under I. Ivanov ....