question

[Детективное агентство Кострома]

To date, they have begun to actively use the witness protection program. At present, even under Art. 315 of the Criminal Code (malicious non-enforcement of a court decision) by the inquiry of two witnesses under the program. The courts now use equipment for remote interrogation, or simply with a half-closed door in the courtroom, they interrogate under a pseudonym, and the exact data in a sealed envelope. To do this, the opera will help you write a statement to your witness about a possible threat, and if it is really valuable then they will include it in the program.
Alexander K.

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

No, Roman, an investigator can classify a witness with one of his decisions (+ a substantiated statement from a witness addressed to the head of the Investigative Committee) and then interrogate him under I. Ivanov ....

Hello Dima!
I may have overslept something, but to date there was no witness protection program in Ukraine. Tomorrow I will clarify a little more.
I talked about the realities in a limited territory (i.e. in Ukraine).

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

thankful in advance, please do not delay the answer, it’s on already ...
Regards BH Eugene

something "burned out" there .... colleagues vividly participate in the discussion, and BH Eugene ..... disappeared ....

 

[Anonymous]

Yes, probably Dmitry’s advice can help in this matter. According to the FSB officers, I think that they don’t need to be pulled, they will take it with great pleasure. In Moscow, in any case, this is so - just give the texture.
Andrei, what a manner to give an answer to a person who came from the height of Olympus. After all, a man of advice asks. And I probably missed something in the legislation. What, polling as a method of BH operation is already prohibited? :?

I’ve been on earth for a long time, and in Russia nowadays, and not 15-20 years ago.
According to the FSB officers - well, let them go down in the lobby to trample down. Right now, scouts scattered on the prosecutors to run into ..., but there’s nothing to take from them ...: lol:
According to the polls, there is nothing forbidden, only all polls with the written consent of the respondent ...: lol: you can introduce the investigator, well, he doesn’t interrogate him anyway, I already said that there are procedural actions, and there are cartoons about BH on television, on which I look at and you, dear judge the work of BH ...: lol:
And stop reproaching me with Olympus, I have been walking in the valley for a long time, watching how you have it in the clouds, still look at “Fiction reading” and draw conclusions on their actions, or finally they picked up the law and began to study it ... : twisted:

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

According to the FSB officers - well, let them go down in the lobby to trample down. Right now, scouts scattered on the prosecutors to run into ..., but there’s nothing to take from them ...: lol:

Andrei, you are in vain, by the way, about the feces ... They also need sticks after all ...: lol: Or maybe some decent one will come across ... A rarity, of course, but it happens ...: lol:

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

I already said that there are procedural actions, but there are cartoons about BH on television, on which I look and you, dear judge the work of BH ...: lol:
And stop reproaching me with Olympus, I have been walking in the valley for a long time, watching how you have it in the clouds, still look at “Fiction reading” and draw conclusions on their actions, or finally they picked up the law and began to study it ... : twisted:

Andrey, hi. You know, I often support you, but now I think that you wrongfully offend a colleague ... in my opinion, you are far from correct in the words I highlighted .... and why so ??

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Brakes need to be pumped ...

 

[Адвокат]

The BH and lawyer can only interview witnesses, but an explanation cannot be the basis of the prosecution. The evidence in the case is a puncture interrogation, which is the investigator or other official on behalf of the investigator. The investigator has the right not to provide information about the identity of the interrogated person, but for this he must have good reason to believe that the witness or his close relatives, relatives or close persons are threatened with murder, violence, destruction or damage to their property or other dangerous illegal acts.
The mere fact that the accused is a prosecutor is not enough for the investigator to decide to keep the witness data secret, for such a decision it is necessary to justify what the witness specifically fears.
In accordance with Part 9 of Article 166 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: “If it is necessary to ensure the safety of the victim, his representative, witness, their close relatives, relatives and close persons, the investigator is entitled in the protocol of the investigative action in which the victim, his representative or witness are involved, not provide information about their personality. In this case the investigator, with the consent of the head of the investigating authority, makes a decision , which sets out the reasons for the decision to keep this data secret, indicates the pseudonym of the participant in the investigative action and provides a sample of his signature, which he will use in the minutes of the investigative actions carried out with his participation. The decision is placed in an envelope, which is then sealed and attached to the criminal case. In urgent cases, the specified investigative action may be carried out on the basis of the decision of the investigator on keeping secret about the identity of the participant in the investigative action without the consent of the head of the investigating authority . In this case, the investigator’s resolution is transmitted to the head of the investigating authority to verify his legality and validity immediately when a real opportunity arises for this. ”

 

[Anonymous]

Of course, I wildly apologize for my answers, but I did not begin to comment on my posts first. I can clearly see who is with whom and for what. I warn you that I have never been an Olympian, you can always see that I am not a moderator and administrator of the forum. The sowing wind will reap the storm. And at the expense of the brakes, I do not need to remind, it is better to pump your own. Want to wrestle with me, I invite you to a separate topic in private ...

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

... The sowing wind will reap the storm. And at the expense of the brakes, I do not need to remind, it is better to pump your own. Want to wrestle with me, I invite you to a separate topic in private ...

: o: shock:: D
Whoa ...
...colleague!!!
... Start the topic ... it can be called, for example - " new gate "...
I AM I prefer speak but choice
the type of "weapon" is yours!
And more ... but do you want a "public" debate?
Well, at least a semi-private !?
However, I agree ... the option proposed by you is a more "intimate" process

PS
The meteorologists I know don't predict storms - so ...
light breeze with gusts ... (from laughter): ugeek: