Need Help Regarding Legalization of Information

[Василий Коновалов]

Good day, dear colleagues!
So, in a nutshell: there is currently a lawsuit on the division of property between the parties. One of the parties, or rather, her lawyer, attracted a private investigator to collect information. The detective forces collected the necessary information, but ... All of the specified data was obtained from sealed sources. Accordingly, "shining" them during the trial is unrealistic. Question: how did you legalize information that was obtained during the course of work that is of significant significance in the case? Interested in, in particular, information about bank accounts, the movement of the facility and administrative penalties.
Thank you for your attention and possible help.
If necessary, I am ready to cooperate on your questions in the territory of the Murmansk region, Russia.

 

[Гусев Антон]

Vasily, good afternoon!
It is necessary to file petitions in the court for the collection of evidence: ask for requests to banks about the availability of accounts, movement to them (the list of banks should be expanded by 3-4). For travel - also ask for court requests to those services that have information. In the end, get official answers containing the same information that the detective collected.

 

[Александра]

I agree with my colleague, as part of the judicial proceedings, the lawyer does not send requests everywhere and on a hunch, but only to those structures where you will receive an “interesting for you” answer in advance. As for the information about the movement, there are only “witnesses” who at that time were in that place about which you have information. If this photo is from the street, then the object accidentally fell into the frame when the photographer took pictures of a beautiful landscape. If the photo shows a car / house owned by a “photographer”, then this is generally legal — he took pictures of his property and an object accidentally got there.

Respectfully,
Garusova Alexandra
head of detective agency
+79037308469

 

[Агентство Профессионал. Ермакова Наталья]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

 

[Александра]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

Natalya, good afternoon. Please send the report form (f.detektiv@yandex.ru) very interesting.

 

[Демитрий]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

Natalya, good day! If it does not make it difficult, please share your report form, it is interesting to compare and learn something new. Thank you in advance! my address smp-port@yandex.ru

 

[Максим2015]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

Good evening, please discard the report form. omega-x74@mail.ru Thank you in advance

 

[частный детектив Владивосток ОДБ]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

Hello, Natalia ! Please also discard the report form to me. My mail : detectiv.07@mail.ru .

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Good day, dear colleagues!
So, in a nutshell: there is currently a lawsuit on the division of property between the parties. One of the parties, or rather, her lawyer, attracted a private investigator to collect information. The detective forces collected the necessary information, but ... All of the specified data was obtained from sealed sources. Accordingly, "shining" them during the trial is unrealistic. Question: how did you legalize information that was obtained during the course of work that is of significant significance in the case? Interested in, in particular, information about bank accounts, the movement of the facility and administrative penalties.
Thank you for your attention and possible help.
If necessary, I am ready to cooperate on your questions in the territory of the Murmansk region, Russia.

In principle, the colleagues speak correctly .... After all, the Black Sea Fleet collects for the process side not information that is or may be evidence in the case, but information about the availability of evidence (or lack thereof) in any place (including the so-called closed ones) sources) .... At the same time, in principle (as practice shows) in such cases there is no need whatsoever for “displaying” any BH reports on the work done to the court ..... Just based on available The information collected by the BH representative of the party (it may be a lawyer or another person) declares a written petition to the court to obtain the necessary information (if of course it is) from those sources that were actually checked by the BH .... And that’s all .. . At the same time, the application does not need to indicate that the presence of these sources of evidence is precisely the person declaring the application it became known from the BH .... Something like this ....

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Good afternoon, I agree with my colleagues about the legalization of the information received through petitions. And I legalized the photo-video materials in the courts through a report that was submitted to the court and announced the interrogation of the detective as a witness. The Federal Law allows us to collect information, including to monitor if the client is a participant in civil proceedings. Several times, the parties declared interference in their personal lives, but refused to initiate proceedings, referring to the Federal Law. In the report, by the way, I also made a reference to the Federal Law, which allows observation. The main thing is to shoot in public places and on the street. There were no problems so far. Good luck with business. I can throw off the report form, if interested.

But interesting .... And what facts were proved in court by providing photo-video materials? If not difficult ... Can you answer this question in this thread ....