Restriction of access to rental premises in case of debt

[Виталий Климин]

Dear ROMAN !!
In principle, all contracts (and not only rents of non-residential premises) are almost the same, terms of payment, penalties ........... so there is no need to "discover America". The landlord always draws up a contract in his favor, since he dictates the terms ....... Well, what is not spelled out in the contract is regulated by the State Duma of the Russian Federation ....... Therefore, it is possible to give approximate advice without studying the contract .. ....

 

[DIBNN]

It is definitely necessary to look at the contract itself

 

[Частный детектив. Мезрин. Севастополь.]

Faced a similar situation. A woman rented her apartment to the tenants for a year. They signed the contract. Everything was as it should. However, after three months the tenants stopped paying. Then they changed the locks, put in a second door. .d. Neither the district police officer, nor anyone else could do anything. This lasted another three months. Two options remained: the court or ...
chose "or" ... At the time when the tenants (tenants) were at work, they invited a ZhEK locksmith, two (their) witnesses. They broke both doors. They also put new locks on them. They put all the belongings in large plastic bags, bandaged them, they sealed it with witnesses and their signatures, and closed it in one of the rooms. The neighbors were told that if the tenants started breaking doors in the evening, they would immediately call the police. Our group remained on duty at the entrance (just in case).
Everything turned out to be simpler. The tenants returned from work, trodden around the door and ... called the mistress. As a result, five days later (as soon as they found new housing) they moved out.
In your case: either in love, or court.
Sincerely.

 

[Москва Детектив]

Colleague, you must first familiarize yourself with the contents of the contract.
Regards, Oleg.

 

[Частный детектив. Timofey. Челябинск.]

SUIT in court, while it is necessary to show the maximum losses from the actions of the tenant, plus the services of a lawyer.

Long but true !!!

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

The poet has the opportunity to give rough advice without studying the contract ......

Vitaliy! I agree.
But - rough advice leads to a rough result, with all the ensuing consequences. In our case, "maybe" is expensive sometimes!
Yours faithfully

 

[Бедеров Игорь Сергеевич]

Sealed today. I recalled my previous experience. In the end, this was precisely the direction of the general. His problems if he loses a tenant. As for "just visiting the tenant", working at the factory made it easier. At night they wrote an act of leakage (fire, etc.), opened the tenant's premises and changed the castle. And in the morning - I'm sorry. We do not bother you, but we can’t give you the keys.

 

[Детективное агентство Оренбург]

In fact, this is a purely legal issue. And what about security? Here, lawyers must bite. All the answers in the civil code about this are there.
So the one who has power is right, and the power in this case is knowledge.
________________________________________________________
* Non-specific question - gives rise to a non-specific answer. Which side does the author advocate and which position should be taken? For example, I didn’t understand ... either from the side of the tenant, or from the side of the landlord, or from the side of the guard, or even a passer-by (watching from the side) *

 

[Частный детектив Киров]

A similar question was asked by my friend, who rented a room for a store. I did not receive money for rent for 3 months. I advised him, without any clues with the tenant, to come to the store, ask all buyers to leave the premises, and then change the castle. Which he did. The tenant rushed in with this money. That's all.

 

[Детективное агентство Кострома]

Here is the Imperial well done. That's right.
Alexander K.