Until now I can’t understand

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Colleagues and visitors of the FORUM - I have been asking the question for many years: LEGAL QUALIFICATION OF ACTIONS BY OFFICERS who SIGNED THE AGREEMENT ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF THE USSR IN THE BELOVEZHSKAYA FOREST? .... If their actions fall under 4 sides of the unlawful act (the Criminal Code and the articles in force at that time) integrity of the "state from the section" Particularly dangerous state crimes "), was it really legal to create independent states? ...... what do colleagues, especially lawyers think? ..... we never thought about that

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

Igor bravo !!!

 

[Детективное агентство. Украина. Харьков. Львов.]

As for me, I would qualify these actions as TREASON

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Well, why didn’t you think about it - you offend the boss.
At that time it was the only right decision !!!!!
Remember - 15 Republics, 15 Presidents + 16th President of the USSR. The Emergency Committee, if successful, would lead to a civil war. At that time, the Army, the Police, the Committee were already divided into two camps.
The people, having drank cognac in the forest and made a decision, pre-war in most of the Union. Then the Caucasus blazed ...
So that their criminal act gave us the opportunity to communicate now.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

As for me, I would qualify these actions as TREASON

There was an article (I can’t vouch for accuracy) - "Actions aimed at undermining integrity ... and tum-tum ... states (state system) and something like that ..."

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Well, why didn’t you think about it - you offend the boss.
At that time it was the only right decision !!!!!
Remember - 15 Republics, 15 Presidents + 16th President of the USSR. The Emergency Committee, if successful, would lead to a civil war. At that time, the Army, the Police, the Committee were already divided into two camps.
The people, having drank cognac in the forest and made a decision, pre-war in most of the Union. Then the Caucasus blazed ...
So that their criminal act gave us the opportunity to communicate now.

There were no presidents, Roma-jan )))) .... And there was no split .... Everyone was waiting for an order .... but he didn’t do it

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

At that time I studied at the Dnepropetrovsk military medical university, I remember very well leaflets among cadets and students in which RUH painted the bright future of Ukraine as an independent state without such “parasites” as Russia and other republics. Statistics were given there, judging by which Ukraine took the leading place among European countries in terms of production volume. It looked believable and impressive. That is, other republics that had to be fed prevented Ukraine from living well. And young people pecked at it, especially against the background of the collapse of the economy at that time.
Remember the referendum, there over 90% of the population supported the secession! How could this be stopped? Moreover, the party nomenclature could not offer anything active.

 

[ДНК]

Here you are ...

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

At that time I studied at the Dnepropetrovsk military medical university, I remember very well leaflets among cadets and students in which RUH painted the bright future of Ukraine as an independent state without such “parasites” as Russia and other republics. Statistics were given there, judging by which Ukraine took the leading place among European countries in terms of production volume. It looked believable and impressive. That is, other republics that had to be fed prevented Ukraine from living well. And young people pecked at it, especially against the background of the collapse of the economy at that time.
Remember the referendum, there over 90% of the population supported the secession! How could this be stopped? Moreover, the party nomenclature could not offer anything active.

Tolya !!! I agree with everything, but you are mistaken in one thing - the referendum asked the question "Do you recognize the independence of Ukraine as part of the USSR" (again, I don’t undertake accuracy, but the meaning is definitely that) .... 70% - yes ( !) .... less -% - no (!) .... and those were for the ONE UNION

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

The referendum was announced on August 24, 1991, together with the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine, and approved on October 11 of that year by a resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. One question was put to the referendum - “Do you confirm the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine?”
84.18% of eligible citizens of Ukraine (31,891,742 people) took part in the vote. 28 804 071 (90.32%) of them supported the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine. Thus, the declaration of independence of Ukraine was confirmed by popular vote.
From Wikipedia.