Psychology of handwriting. Graph analysis with Inessa Goldberg

[Частный детектив]

Inessa, hello! Agency Kassandra (Kiev) at your service!

 

[Инесса Гольдберг]

Thank you!
I am very moved by the interest of each of you and the general geography of the participants.

I personally greet my next new interlocutors and colleagues:
- Dmitry (Krasnoyarsk),
- Konstantin (Tula, we actively cooperate with your city too),
- Eugene (Kazan. I answer you: of course, they called me here for this)
- Andrei (Novosibirsk. You have a very insightful idea in the signature - today the information is the most valuable. And the benefit - of course, will not only be for me: it’s useful for me to tell about myself, and for you to get useful information from me that almost none of Russian-language forensic scientists, handwriting experts and detectives. Even at the FSB (they study with us and get information). I’m ready to share - at least, what’s possible in the framework of a public forum),
- Anatolia (Krasnoyarsk. And hello to you!),
- Dmitry (Novosibirsk),
- Alexandra (Kostroma).
- Alexandra (Kiev. Mutually!)

It is very nice to feel that you are already almost a part of your wonderful brotherhood of followers of Sherlock Holmes!

I see that Andrei and all of you are raising an excellent project, it feels like real collegiality, and not competition of specialists. I myself am at the origins of the same international project in my field, and I understand how important this is.

I think it will be useful for every inquisitive expert to know at least the principles or some methods of psychological (and not just comparative) analysis of handwriting. Of course, psychological information about a person, including the degree of reliability, strengths or weaknesses, talents, intelligence - is not evidence in itself. For example, a person with a tendency to deceive might not be related to a specific fraud. However, the chances are very high and information about what you can or cannot expect from a particular person, who is the leader, and who is inspired and led, who is aggressive, who is only verbally conflicted, and who is diplomatic and polite, what are the person’s motives - material, recognition, benefits, personal principles, idea- fix, bigotry - it's hard to overestimate.

 

[Детективное агентство. Украина. Киев.]

I myself want to know more about myself and about my handwriting))))

 

[@InfoPoisk]

Inessa, the city of 3 revolutions welcomes you to the forum. I hope for mutually beneficial cooperation.

 

[Инесса Гольдберг]

Argus, Peter, I welcome you too!

I myself want to know more about myself and about my handwriting))))

It is important to be aware of three things:

1. Of course, here we will not arrange a public "show", everyone better let them know their weaknesses, without advertising them. However, you have two options to learn about your handwriting (about your personality):
a) Having come up with a pseudonym, sign up in a queue for a brief (and therefore free) analysis at a forum specially created to demonstrate the capabilities of graph analysis, (see my signature);
b) Having described the most striking features of his writing (it is clear that this is less accurate, I will have to ask leading questions).

2. It is important to understand that we are all somewhat subjective and to perceive information about ourselves or about a character about which there is a certain stereotype is much more complicated than about an unfamiliar person (third person).

3. In any case, in order to be “fearless”, it is important to understand that a professional expert graphologist never “judges”: there are no emotional judgments. There are no labels "lazy person", "scoundrel", "parasite". Only a description, behavior, features, explanation of the background.

At one time, I was incredibly lucky: for the first time our Israeli "star" in graph analysis, Nurit Bar-Lev (last year I interviewed her for my magazine and translated into Russian, I can give a link to read), changed my habits and agreed to take a student seeing the potential in me. It’s still hard to believe, but she always believed in me. I studied with her for 4 years and keep her note “I believe in you, you will see who you will become,” because in the year when I passed the diploma exams, two of the graduates passed, and I was one of two. I remembered about this a few years later that I was also told that I would write books - and it is true that today there are 8 of them, and in the process - the following, together with my Russian followers.

What am I telling you. This Master very wisely taught me one thing: "Remember, there are no bad people. There are people who feel bad." There is no "evil", even a very great evil, for no reason. We do not engage in public condemnation and moralization. We do not condone unpleasant people and especially criminals. I myself, several years ago, having already become well-known in the Russian-speaking space, came across (in handwriting) cruel, cunning, envious and vengeful people, and it was easy for me to talk about their character calmly, until I began to interfere with some of them across the roads. And somewhere my objectivity disappeared when I felt the charm of their character "in their own skin", threats, fraud, fabrications that really threatened my reputation. I did not succumb to provocations, but I received useful lessons - I felt how really scary such people are about whom you sometimes simply “publish” their characteristics. Nevertheless, our function is to find out and show, why how a person lives, what he thinks is behind his actions, what is his main fear or motive.

Here is another example. Three can do the same: give a lot of money to charity. We, as ordinary people, of course, interpret subjectively, in accordance with "common sense": "well done man, probably good and kind." However, analyzing their handwriting (personality), we can see who did it sincerely, who - thus essentially "invested money" in their rating and public opinion, and who - most likely, having criminal inclinations, "laundered" that something. That is why it is impossible to completely "reconstruct the handwriting" according to the description of a person - usually we do not all know about him. This is how to describe the artist in words the general features of "Mona Lisa" - you will get a portrait from afar of a similar woman, but near - in general a different face.

And so far you have such a question for training: Have you noticed that in some handwritings of people there is more unwritten, white space, voids - more than recorded? And didn’t they pay attention to what was common between them? I’ll make a reservation right away: signs and phenomena in handwriting are separate symptoms, one cannot be judged by one, and therefore each sign has a certain range of interpretations. Finally defines the "symptom complex." Nevertheless, we are talking about a general trend.

P.S. Colleagues, if you are interested in my area, I invite you to watch (with a translation into Russian) a story about a study at our University of Haifa (Israel), which now has proven in hardware that in determining the sincerity and honesty of a handwritten text, the analysis of the handwriting turned out to be no less accurate than polygraph. Although, of course, the main potential of handwriting analysis is in defining many other data.

 

[Орлан]

I think it is necessary for Inessa at the 2nd congress of the MOD to give the floor for the report, it is useful to listen. What say colleagues?

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

I think it is necessary for Inessa at the 2nd congress of the MOD to give the floor for the report, it is useful to listen. What say colleagues?

Easier to reschedule our meeting in Haifa ...

 

[Азербайджан. Баку.]

Hello, Inessa! Glad to see you on the forum. We work together!

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

I think it is necessary for Inessa at the 2nd congress of the MOD to give the floor for the report, it is useful to listen. What say colleagues?

Easier to reschedule our meeting in Haifa ...

Inessa and I agreed that she would make a report online at our congress via the Internet.
We need to decide which questions are most interesting to us.

 

[Орлан]

I think it is necessary for Inessa at the 2nd congress of the MOD to give the floor for the report, it is useful to listen. What say colleagues?

Easier to reschedule our meeting in Haifa ...

Inessa and I agreed that she would make a report online at our congress via the Internet.
We need to decide which questions are most interesting to us.

Well, that’s fine too, but you have to think about the questions. or as an option not to ask Inessa 100 questions, but to decide on one common topic, which Inessa would tell about, what would you say?