to find a debtor in Estonia, Latvia. I pay 10 thousand euros

[Николай111]

Good day. Services are required to search for the debtor (fraudster) and
repayment of debt. Man provided shipping services
(electronics) across the border from Estonia to Russia, bypassing customs.
Naturally, this goes beyond the scope of the law, so no
there are no contracts and other things. Goods purchased in Germany were sent to
address to Estonia. From there it was transported to the Russian Federation. There are addresses of two couriers,
one of them took the goods to their address in Estonia. Through it you need
go to the organizer, with whom I agreed, communicated and
paid for work. Perhaps he lives in Latvia, (judging by his
according to). On condition of returning my goods, I pay a fee in
the amount of 10 thousand euros. Details of the calculation and other information can
discuss in a letter, or by phone. Leave your contacts in PM

 

[Хагани]

I see. Well, not an easy job ............

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

So the search for the debtor or return of goods?

 

[Роберт]

I was engaged in such schemes for a long time when I worked at customs. Contact me, maybe I'll tell you something sensible. To be honest, it’s easier to put in a double bass than to solve the financial issue. Especially if a lot of time has passed. And you can already forget about the load forever. And to us, about the reward: D

 

[Роберт]

By the way, about electronics, Pyatakov (the smuggler of St. Petersburg) has already drowned. About three days ago: D. And his wife, too: D

 

[Евгений СБ]

Nikolay, your wishes are clear. But in this case, the situation should be divided into: search and receipt of debt. The search is paid separately and is not included in the amount of remuneration offered by you upon the collection of debts. The second question is recovery. Not everyone deals with these issues. And those involved, as a rule, work for a percentage of the amount recovered. Although, the amount announced by you may fit into acceptable interest.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Nikolay, your wishes are clear. But in this case, the situation should be divided into: search and receipt of debt. The search is paid separately and is not included in the amount of remuneration offered by you upon the collection of debts. The second question is recovery. Not everyone deals with these issues. And those involved, as a rule, work for a percentage of the amount recovered. Although, the amount announced by you may fit into acceptable interest.

Eugene is absolutely right.
Flies separately, cutlets separately.

 

[Николай111]

I understand everything, but you also understand - I need a specific result, namely the return of technology. Since it is not a fact that the detective will find exactly the person who is needed. It is not a fact that the debtor will then not begin to hide after it is simply found. Therefore, I see a solution to the situation as a package of services. I understand that not everyone does this. But on the other hand, I believe that a good detective must have different methods of influence to solve the problem and it is not necessary to act on his own behalf or within the framework of the law. This is not very effective these days.

 

[Роберт]

I understand everything, but you also understand - I need a specific result, namely the return of technology. Since it is not a fact that the detective will find exactly the person who is needed. It is not a fact that the debtor will then not begin to hide after it is simply found. Therefore, I see a solution to the situation as a package of services. I understand that not everyone does this. But on the other hand, I believe that a good detective must have different methods of influence to solve the problem and it is not necessary to act on his own behalf or within the framework of the law. This is not very effective these days.

The scope of the law is such a thing that when you cross them you sometimes have to pay a lot more than 10,000 euros. Russia is a country of paradoxes.
It’s easier to pay a lower amount for getting a particular compromising evidence. And having this compromising evidence, decide for yourself how to use it to return the equipment. Good dirt is like honey: they flock to it themselves, so that it would not be worse.

 

[Олегас]

In Estonia, such matters are very difficult to resolve. And Eugene is right - work from 2 parts is possible, guarantees for the result in such cases are not legitimately given. A gambler should, if he wants, take risks.