CHARTER of the non-profit partnership "MOD"

[Частный детектив Севастополь ОДБ]

I was practically persuaded to abandon interest and refocus orders on myself.
Tips me chuyka, so be it.

So we immediately told you about it at the Conference. And the trouble is less, and no one will be thinking of money from orders from each other.
Well, the membership fee should not be $ 50. And at least $ 200-300 ....

Seryozha! Each of these figures may have the right to life, but the concept of the sum is strictly subjective for everyone, therefore, it is necessary to discuss and put to the vote.

 

[Игорь Коракс]

I was practically persuaded to abandon interest and refocus orders on myself.
Tips me chuyka, so be it.

So we immediately told you about it at the Conference. And the trouble is less, and no one will be thinking of money from orders from each other.
Well, the membership fee should not be $ 50. And at least $ 200-300 ....

And my opinion, all the same, the percentages would be correct. And membership fees remained at the level of $ 50-100, +/- inflation, etc.
Because the number, quality and stability of orders is very different both in countries and regions, respectively, and the detective’s income. Deductions would be commensurate with earnings.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

I continue to express my opinion about %% ..... I will try to formulate it reasonably ..... I think ...

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I was practically persuaded to abandon interest and refocus orders on myself.
Tips me chuyka, so be it.

So we immediately told you about it at the Conference. And the trouble is less, and no one will be thinking of money from orders from each other.
Well, the membership fee should not be $ 50. And at least $ 200-300 ....

Seryozha! Each of these figures may have the right to life, but the concept of the sum is strictly subjective for everyone, therefore, it is necessary to discuss and put to the vote.

Sasha, I wrote this amount, just expressed his proposal, nothing more. I have a double feeling: I understand each of our legionnaire, because everyone’s earnings are different, but I also think how our Partnership can live on $ 50. Remember how much our President indicated, which he had already invested in only one forum, on his promotion and all that. And this is just one of the issues under the Partnership cost item.
Once again I repeat, I expressed only my point of view.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Sasha, I wrote this amount, just expressed his proposal, nothing more. I have a double feeling: I understand each of our legionnaire, because everyone’s earnings are different, but I also think how our Partnership can live on $ 50. Remember how much our President indicated, which he had already invested in only one forum, on his promotion and all that. And this is just one of the issues under the Partnership cost item.

that's why I still think that DO NOT share INCOME is not fair .... Nobody asks to look for money somewhere, earned, share .... what is shameful or wrong here? .....
For example:
- received an order from a colleague from the MOD (or directly from the MOD, or another option between colleagues in the MOD)
- the initiator of the order posted preliminary information about this in the closed MOD base (Dima from Kaliningrad makes such bases reliable and simple)
- the order did not work out after elaboration - noted in the database about the cancellation of the order
- an order was formed, entered the data on the NET profit and SENT the set% to the MOD (I don’t see the difficulty to send me and my Russian colleague 10% of the NET profit on the development of the MOD) while the President wrote off the completed order ......

What is difficult if you have basic honesty?

 

[Частный детектив Севастополь ОДБ]

This is all absolutely correct and honest, but unanimity on this issue is necessary, otherwise we will get constant backstage intrigues

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

Sasha, I wrote this amount, just expressed his proposal, nothing more. I have a double feeling: I understand each of our legionnaire, because everyone’s earnings are different, but I also think how our Partnership can live on $ 50. Remember how much our President indicated, which he had already invested in only one forum, on his promotion and all that. And this is just one of the issues under the Partnership cost item.

that's why I still think that DO NOT share INCOME is not fair .... Nobody asks to look for money somewhere, earned, share .... what is shameful or wrong here? .....
For example:
- received an order from a colleague from the MOD (or directly from the MOD, or another option between colleagues in the MOD)
- the initiator of the order posted preliminary information about this in the closed MOD base (Dima from Kaliningrad makes such bases reliable and simple)
- the order did not work out after elaboration - noted in the database about the cancellation of the order
- an order was formed, entered the data on the NET profit and SENT the set% to the MOD (I don’t see the difficulty to send me and my Russian colleague 10% of the NET profit on the development of the MOD) while the President wrote off the completed order ......

What is difficult if you have basic honesty?

Igor, my friend, I understand you perfectly. Your scheme definitely has the right to life. And you wrote everything correctly about sharing income. But where is the guarantee that it will not start, put it bluntly, rat-dog ??? I don’t want to offend any of our colleagues with this, but it’s just life. And when there are orders not for tens of thousands of national currency, but for tens of thousands of bucks or euros, then it will begin "stirring in the brain" . And so calmly paid in the form of a membership fee and earn as much as you like, here the conscience is already clear, both before yourself and before the Partnership. I singled out two of your points precisely for the purpose of making it clear where you can not pay to the Partnership. How? I think everyone knows. So what??? Also create your own CSS ??? So here we are just going to double-check each other !!! It’s easier to watch the circuit.
Just before the Conference, I lost a second friend, tested over the years, a real, as I thought to the last, friend. And he lost it simply because of money in the general business. Once again, this is life. And God grant, of course, that we have everything differently.
But in any case, I will take it for granted if the majority will vote for the interest on the order. I'm like everyone else. Once again, I ask you to correctly understand my words, I did not want to offend anyone by writing about rats.
Igor, I think that you understood me correctly. If I touched someone in my own words, I apologize. These are not emotions, these are elementary truths of life.

 

[Частный детектив. Панда. Краснодар.]

I completely subscribe to every word of Sergey, while I don’t want to offend anyone.
With respect,
Panda.

 

[Евгений СБ]

I believe that the membership fees agreed at the conference in the amount of $ 50 should be left. Because for some, the announced amount of 200-300 may be unbearable. In addition, someone may not receive a single order in a year. And give the membership. Someone on orders will only be able to beat off the membership, without earning for themselves and bread.

 

[Частный детектив Киев.]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.