CHARTER of the non-profit partnership "MOD"

[Евгений СБ]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

The only question that remains is about laying your own interest. Or is the percentage of MOD not deducted from it?

 

[Anonymous]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final artist, Andrey adds MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

The only question that remains is about laying your own interest. Or is the percentage of MOD not deducted from it?

 

[Частный детектив Киев.]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

The only question that remains is about laying your own interest. Or is the percentage of MOD not deducted from it?

The percentage of MOD was already calculated by Andrey, after receiving a price from Vadim.

Natalie, sorry .. I did not notice the highlighted in red ..

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

I continue to insist on stable membership fees!
The amount can vary from 50 to 100 dollars, or more, I propose to discuss this separately ...
The scheme proposed by Alexander from Kiev, all the same, does not exclude the factor of possible concealment of% of the order;
Again, I earned money, you need to pay a percentage, you think, aah, damn it, you need to buy a new washing machine, then I’ll pay ... But it was forgotten once ...
Another point! Sometimes, when ordering a total cost of 30 thousand, I get on hand, minus all expenses, 5-6-7 thousand, not more!
Filing a percentage of MOD is good! But...
Our services are already not cheap, and here the price tag increases by 20% ... And plus another 10-20 percent of the intermediary ... But I also do not want to reduce the cost of my services, and I won’t; I know the price of my work ... And somehow I don’t really want to work for a penny !!!

And the contributions are specific, once a year - the best option !!! And technically simpler, both for participants and for NP MOD!
And if some serious expenses are to be expected at NP MOD, well, for example, I don’t know about anything serious, they raised a question, discussed, voted, took a ruble or two, everything, the question is closed !!!
The most reliable mechanism is the simplest mechanism! A simple example is a lever!

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I believe that the membership fees agreed at the conference in the amount of $ 50 should be left. Because for some, the announced amount of 200-300 may be unbearable. In addition, someone may not receive a single order in a year. And give the membership. Someone on orders will only be able to beat off the membership, without earning for themselves and bread.

Eugene, this amount offhand, on the specifics of the membership fees will need to vote.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I continue to insist on stable membership fees!
The amount can vary from 50 to 100 dollars, or more, I propose to discuss this separately ...
The scheme proposed by Alexander from Kiev, all the same, does not exclude the factor of possible concealment of% of the order;
Again, I earned money, you need to pay a percentage, you think, aah, damn it, you need to buy a new washing machine, then I’ll pay ... But it was forgotten once ...
Another point! Sometimes, when ordering a total cost of 30 thousand, I get on hand, minus all expenses, 5-6-7 thousand, not more!
Filing a percentage of MOD is good! But...
Our services are already not cheap, and here the price tag increases by 20% ... And plus another 10-20 percent of the intermediary ... But I also do not want to reduce the cost of my services, and I won’t; I know the price of my work ... And somehow I don’t really want to work for a penny !!!

And the contributions are specific, once a year - the best option !!! And technically simpler, both for participants and for NP MOD!
And if some serious expenses are to be expected at NP MOD, well, for example, I don’t know about anything serious, they raised a question, discussed, voted, took a ruble or two, everything, the question is closed !!!
The most reliable mechanism is the simplest mechanism! A simple example is a lever!

All ingenious is simple !!! Vadik, I completely agree with you.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

On your last offer I do not agree with you. Considering your scheme, see what I can do: After receiving the order and understanding that I am not able to fulfill it myself, I bypassing Andrei (for various reasons) call up the same Vadim (all our contacts are written with a signature in everyone ), and directly agree on a deal. At the same time I tell Vadim that if something happened, we did not work out any orders with him. Now the question is: How do you check us ??? No way, I'm in Omsk, he’s generally in Vladik. And in specific life situations, subjective reasons to conduct a deal directly, bypassing NP MOD, I think there is.
Colleagues, based on interest payments, we will constantly suspect each other that someone did not pay something to the MOD. Do we need this ???
I expressed only my subjective opinion.

 

[Частный детектив Севастополь ОДБ]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

On your last offer I do not agree with you. Considering your scheme, see what I can do: After receiving the order and understanding that I am not able to fulfill it myself, I bypassing Andrei (for various reasons) call up the same Vadim (all our contacts are written with a signature in everyone ), and directly agree on a deal. At the same time I tell Vadim that if something happened, we did not work out any orders with him. Now the question is: How do you check us ??? No way, I'm in Omsk, he’s generally in Vladik. And in specific life situations, subjective reasons to conduct a deal directly, bypassing NP MOD, I think there is.
Colleagues, based on interest payments, we will constantly suspect each other that someone did not pay something to the MOD. Do we need this ???
I expressed only my subjective opinion.

Seryozha! I also liked the option of Alexander (Kiev) the most and I consider it promising. And what you say is already a matter of conscience for each forum participant. Maybe in some justified cases, the resolution of issues directly has the right to life, but such cases must be. agreed upon.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

I am inclined to the second option - for example, I received a potential order from the outside, but in a different region, where I can’t get it on my own and can only be done through my MOD colleagues (for example, in the Far East). I describe the order (without unnecessary details, which I do not have from the customer yet) to Andrei. Andrey contacts Vadim. Vadim sets his price as the final performer, Andrey adds the MOD percent and calls the full price to me. I add my percentage and expose to the customer. The customer agrees - I reset all the data to Vadim and he completes the order. The customer does not agree, he walks in the woods (or we are negotiating a compromise ..) Also in the opposite direction ..
Here rats are almost unlikely.

On your last offer I do not agree with you. Considering your scheme, see what I can do: After receiving the order and understanding that I am not able to fulfill it myself, I bypassing Andrei (for various reasons) call up the same Vadim (all our contacts are written with a signature in everyone ), and directly agree on a deal. At the same time I tell Vadim that if something happened, we did not work out any orders with him. Now the question is: How do you check us ??? No way, I'm in Omsk, he’s generally in Vladik. And in specific life situations, subjective reasons to conduct a deal directly, bypassing NP MOD, I think there is.
Colleagues, based on interest payments, we will constantly suspect each other that someone did not pay something to the MOD. Do we need this ???
I expressed only my subjective opinion.

Seryozha! I also liked the option of Alexander (Kiev) the most and I consider it promising. And what you say is already a matter of conscience for each forum participant. Maybe in some justified cases, the resolution of issues directly has the right to life, but such cases must be. agreed upon.

Yes, Sasha, conscience is the best controller. However...

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

I continue to insist on stable membership fees!
The amount can vary from 50 to 100 dollars, or more, I propose to discuss this separately ...
The scheme proposed by Alexander from Kiev, all the same, does not exclude the factor of possible concealment of% of the order;
Again, I earned money, you need to pay a percentage, you think, aah, damn it, you need to buy a new washing machine, then I’ll pay ... But it was forgotten once ...
Another point! Sometimes, when ordering a total cost of 30 thousand, I get on hand, minus all expenses, 5-6-7 thousand, not more!
Filing a percentage of MOD is good! But...
Our services are already not cheap, and here the price tag increases by 20% ... And plus another 10-20 percent of the intermediary ... But I also do not want to reduce the cost of my services, and I won’t; I know the price of my work ... And somehow I don’t really want to work for a penny !!!

And the contributions are specific, once a year - the best option !!! And technically simpler, both for participants and for NP MOD!
And if some serious expenses are to be expected at NP MOD, well, for example, I don’t know about anything serious, they raised a question, discussed, voted, took a ruble or two, everything, the question is closed !!!
The most reliable mechanism is the simplest mechanism! A simple example is a lever!

I fully subscribe to the words of Vadim!
With interest, we will go nowhere, firstly the already described supports (rats), Secondly - The client WILL NOT work at such prices !!! I will take mine, Andrew mine, my third link and, as a result, either bend over and get 5 rubles per loaf of bread, or the client simply refuses to work more expensive ...