CHARTER of the non-profit partnership "MOD"

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Andrey, everything is fine, but here is your last line - "If an order comes to a detective from more than one city and it is necessary to" pull up "detectives from the forum, then again through me" - real operational work may not work, because another, in my opinion, extra step is being created. I am not talking about mediation,% and money, but about the efficiency of work.
Just for example, my super-duper operation, when I led a person from Vladivostok to Moscow ... I pulled people to work only (as it later turned out: lol from the Forum, spoke directly with local performers. If I did this through Peter, through you, I'm afraid we wouldn’t work like that. I’m not saying that you wouldn’t have done it (you would have done it unambiguously!), You’ll just get another transmission link, and you may get a “broken phone” when I need one, because of interference on the phone you I heard another, as a result I got a third.
Plus a time factor! Some points will need to be done on-line, and you, for example, on a business trip, Mikhalych in the country, Ruslan was hanging on the Internet ...: lol:

OK.
We put me in the course of events and do not forget% for the development of MOD.
I repeat, I do not care for my pocket. He does not bring me financial income and is unlikely to bring it soon (comparing what you invest and what we pull out). The forum must be translated into foreign languages, promoted in Russia and abroad.
Yes, we have now become a “serious office” in the CIS, but for example, it’s not interesting for me.
The challenge is the whole world!

 

[Детективное агентство. Москва. Арбат.]

I am satisfied with the last option proposed by Andrei, if he is comfortable with it - we agree.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

As you say, Andrey, it will be so !!!
I think that in the dispute about deductions to the MOD, in which everyone defended their point of view, everyone thought about the same thing - how to help the MOD, making money through it.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

..... dropped out of the discussion .... but the finger reaches for the calculator ..... Let's say members of the MOD = 100 .... 100x50 $ = $ 5000 (per year) .... 5000: 12 = 416 , $ 67 (per month) ..... We are generous and cool boys .....

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

Or can it take the principle of the ARD? There are membership fees and no percent of orders. Anyone who pays fees in addition to orders gets access, for example, to a workplace by viewing the same legal entities online both by company and by name. Not paid - access is closed. And I think it is not advisable to calculate the percentage. Add 20% - we’ll catch fire, competitors will kill the order. On the contrary, the MOU should, due to personal contacts, reduce the number of intermediaries, reduce the cost of fulfilling the order and thereby attract customers, and therefore push competitors away. For example, for information, from those resources to which I have direct access, I don’t take money from my colleagues (they themselves offer !!!), and I don’t take full money from MODOVTS. : D

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Colleagues, let's try to develop the proposal of the President.
An order comes to the forum, Andrei is negotiating with both the customer and the contractor. The result is an order value that suits the customer and payment to the detective who suits the detective. What happens to margin is correct, this is the income of MOD or Andrey and Ruslan (as anyone considers it). But in my opinion, the scheme is absolutely normal: the customer is satisfied, he paid exactly as much as he agreed. The detective is satisfied, he earned exactly as much as he agreed. And the MOD has got money, which Andrei can dispose of and cover maintenance costs. And no one calculates any percent.

It seems to me that such a scheme has the right to live.

 

[Плотников Юрий Михайлович]

I completely agree with Vadim and Anatoly. The simpler the mechanism, the more reliable it is.
works.

 

[Евгений СБ]

Colleagues, let's try to develop the proposal of the President.
An order comes to the forum, Andrei is negotiating with both the customer and the contractor. The result is an order value that suits the customer and payment to the detective who suits the detective. What happens to margin is correct, this is the income of MOD or Andrey and Ruslan (as anyone considers it). But in my opinion, the scheme is absolutely normal: the customer is satisfied, he paid exactly as much as he agreed. The detective is satisfied, he earned exactly as much as he agreed. And the MOD has got money, which Andrei can dispose of and cover maintenance costs. And no one calculates any percent.

It seems to me that such a scheme has the right to live.

Cyril option is good when the order came to the Forum from the side. And when does one of the colleagues upload the order? Those. he will initially have to tell the customer that they will contact him on his question? And if the customer is a trustee and does not want to communicate with another?

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

Colleagues, let's try to develop the proposal of the President.
An order comes to the forum, Andrei is negotiating with both the customer and the contractor. The result is an order value that suits the customer and payment to the detective who suits the detective. What happens to margin is correct, this is the income of MOD or Andrey and Ruslan (as anyone considers it). But in my opinion, the scheme is absolutely normal: the customer is satisfied, he paid exactly as much as he agreed. The detective is satisfied, he earned exactly as much as he agreed. And the MOD has got money, which Andrei can dispose of and cover maintenance costs. And no one calculates any percent.

It seems to me that such a scheme has the right to live.

Cyril option is good when the order came to the Forum from the side. And when does one of the colleagues upload the order? Those. he will initially have to tell the customer that they will contact him on his question? And if the customer is a trustee and does not want to communicate with another?

I agree with Eugene. If the order came directly to the forum, then there are no questions. And for this, in general, I suggest MOD to register specials. a number where customers can call for free from any region of Russia, for example, 8 800 ХХХ ХХХХ. Maintenance of such a number is paid, but this is part of the membership fee.

 

[Игорь Коракс]

Colleagues, let's try to develop the proposal of the President.
An order comes to the forum, Andrei is negotiating with both the customer and the contractor. The result is an order value that suits the customer and payment to the detective who suits the detective. What happens to margin is correct, this is the income of MOD or Andrey and Ruslan (as anyone considers it). But in my opinion, the scheme is absolutely normal: the customer is satisfied, he paid exactly as much as he agreed. The detective is satisfied, he earned exactly as much as he agreed. And the MOD has got money, which Andrei can dispose of and cover maintenance costs. And no one calculates any percent.

It seems to me that such a scheme has the right to live.

Cyril option is good when the order came to the Forum from the side. And when does one of the colleagues upload the order? Those. he will initially have to tell the customer that they will contact him on his question? And if the customer is a trustee and does not want to communicate with another?

I agree with Eugene. If the order came directly to the forum, then there are no questions. And for this, in general, I suggest MOD to register specials. a number where customers can call for free from any region of Russia, for example, 8 800 ХХХ ХХХХ. Maintenance of such a number is paid, but this is part of the membership fee.

This is by the way a good option. This will also be the hotline of the MOD. And it is convenient for customers and for the image very much. How much does it cost only such a number?