Competitive intelligence in the Premier League business

[Бюро Рысь]

Judging by the fact that I asked my question on July 19, and now at 10.40 p.m. and for three and a half hours there is no answer - the question turned out to be difficult.

We see a mote in the prying eye, in our own - we do not notice the log.

Most likely, I miss some questions without noticing, I don’t want to answer some questions, for example, not to make senseless bickering or send a questioner in three letters. Usually people to whom the answer to the question is really important just ask again. I myself do this. I do not insist, but tell how I see it.

When a question was asked on the topic in an open forum - I answer it, if I have such an opportunity . If suddenly you are unhappy with this - there is such a button - "Private message" is called. You know, it helps to get an answer exclusively from the person you want

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

The concept of "search" in the laws of the Russian Federation is not deciphered

Clear. Thank. Therefore, there is no definition on which the Law is based. OK.

due to the fact that this is a historical legal term

I appreciate your opinion, but I think that’s not why. And because the Law is old and written by inexperienced people in such matters. After all, any Law, in theory, should not allow ambiguities, and here it’s not that there is ambiguity.

Well, if you have to use dictionaries instead of the Law, then I personally accept for sowing as a working version that the Counterintelligence Dictionary is unlikely to regulate market research.

In addition, it is unlikely that such historically determined meanings of the “investigation” as "In the old days: a special procedure for investigating criminal cases; interrogation under torture" or "an order that carried out the search for runaway peasants, slaves" also related to the topic.

Based on the context (oh ... this is in the basic concept of the Law ...), this is most often found in dictionaries: "Tracking and tracing criminals" . At least, the dictionaries of Kuznetsov and Shvedova say so.

Then the Law reads roughly (oh ...) like this:

"Article 3. Types of security services and services for tracking and tracing criminals
Private detective ... activities are carried out to track down and search for criminals ...
In order to track down and search for criminals, the following types of services are allowed: "(and hereinafter referred to as the list).

Well, much has become clear to me. The main thing is that practice fits into this picture, in general. Well, more or less.

Thank you, Andrey. You really helped me sort out the issue.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Dear Lynx Bureau, let's finish the bazaar already, OK? You will suddenly have something to say on the case - come. And so - no need.
I realized - you do not love me. OK. I will live with it.
Enough. Calm down.

 

[Бюро Рысь]

Dear Lynx Bureau, let's finish the bazaar already, OK? You will suddenly have something to say on the case - come. And so - no need.
I realized - you do not love me. OK. I will live with it.
Enough. Calm down.

I just wanted to say what you need to start to learn how to do what you require from others. Then you can demand something.
And you are not a girl to love you or not to love you. I respect you as a specialist in my industry and no more.

And please do not need to indicate to whom and where to go.

And to the account in the case, the bazaar and so on
Do not ask stupid questions so as not to get stupid answers!

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Dear Lynx Bureau, yes, everything is clear. Take it easy.

 

[Роберт]

Well, are you all probably kidding? While the tuttava was not there. Just like the "Fathers and Sons" of Turgenev. At first they began to code everything, they began to prove that it was illegal. Like that.
Father: -I'm a lawyer!
Son: -I'm not a lawyer!
Father: -Let's see, there are rules for everything, otherwise it’s not legal.
Son: -I'm not a lawyer, I don’t need to know the rules. What is not prohibited is allowed!
Voices in the background: -You did not answer the question, therefore, you are not Copenhagen!
Son: -So. I said that I'm not a lawyer ....
further replicas are repeated 20 times in the same way, but in different ways, then ..
Son: -And let's talk at least about something interesting to you, about lawyers ....
Next is an active historical dialogue.

My opinion.
Let's get to the extreme. Well, like, by analogy with the above reasoning. In my company, employees go to the toilet, but there is no OKVED code: shock: So this is ILLEGAL !!!

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

Well, are you all probably kidding? While the tuttava was not there. Just like the "Fathers and Sons" of Turgenev. At first they began to code everything, they began to prove that it was illegal. Like that.
Father: -I'm a lawyer!
Son: -I'm not a lawyer!
Father: -Let's see, there are rules for everything, otherwise it’s not legal.
Son: -I'm not a lawyer, I don’t need to know the rules. What is not prohibited is allowed!
Voices in the background: -You did not answer the question, therefore, you are not Copenhagen!
Son: -So. I said that I'm not a lawyer ....
further replicas are repeated 20 times in the same way, but in different ways, then ..
Son: -And let's talk at least about something interesting to you, about lawyers ....
Next is an active historical dialogue.

My opinion.
Let's get to the extreme. Well, like, by analogy with the above reasoning. In my company, employees go to the toilet, but there is no OKVED code: shock: So this is ILLEGAL !!!

Haha

 

[Роберт]

But seriously, you just need to understand the terminology of other people. Not everyone worked in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The main thing is that the thoughts are extremely clear. The main thing is that this is useful in work. And that’s it !!!

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Well done Robert!

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Well, are you all probably kidding? While the tuttava was not there. Just like the "Fathers and Sons" of Turgenev. At first they began to code everything, they began to prove that it was illegal. Like that.
Father: -I'm a lawyer!
Son: -I'm not a lawyer!
Father: -Let's see, there are rules for everything, otherwise it’s not legal.
Son: -I'm not a lawyer, I don’t need to know the rules. What is not prohibited is allowed!
Voices in the background: -You did not answer the question, therefore, you are not Copenhagen!
Son: -So. I said that I'm not a lawyer ....
further replicas are repeated 20 times in the same way, but in different ways, then ..
Son: -And let's talk at least about something interesting to you, about lawyers ....
Next is an active historical dialogue.

My opinion.
Let's get to the extreme. Well, like, by analogy with the above reasoning. In my company, employees go to the toilet, but there is no OKVED code: shock: So this is ILLEGAL !!!

+1

But another thing is much more interesting - when it turned out that the Detective Law on the NPV does not just allow collecting information about the market and chatting with people.
He is allowed to collect market information and chat exclusively with people. for investigation .
Which (detective), in turn, is narrated not by the Law, but by a wide variety of legal literature no more than the “Tales of the Brothers Grimm”. This circumstance makes the situation an order of magnitude more fun than relying on OKVED codes assigned at the personal request of the founder of the company at any time and without any additional conditions.