INTEGRUM and its features

[Бюро Рысь]

Someone hears me, why do I need a base with such junk inside, I checked the companies and they gave me information 4 years ago, there already 3 times people changed including detectors and owners. Sense from this base, if the information is as old as the world and will not give you anything?

Oh ... not in vain I wrote about the "UPDATE" button in the system.

Igor do not consider yourself smarter than others! Updated more than once! And I checked not according to one data. Your program is collecting junk, but if something changes they will be happy to deal with, as well as wasted time!

 

[Бедеров Игорь Сергеевич]

Integrum Competitor Identification


Integrum Company search by sequential specification of details


Integrum Credit Profile


Integrum Contracts Bankruptcy Courts


Integrum Participation of firms in arbitration processes


Integrum Corporate Structure Chart


Integrum Search for media references about the company and persons

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Thanks Igor!

 

[Плотников Юрий Михайлович]

Thank!

 

[Роберт]

I don’t know about junk. Ukraine and Moldova are unlikely to be interested in all of this. Especially now. If, indeed, there will be three Ukraine in the near future, then there is no sense: D for them. But, anyway, everything depends on the cost of using the system. Personally, I can’t even pay 5000 per month for objective reasons. Therefore, all this is good, but for many colleagues this is still an impossible business.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

In principle, Robert, all this info that this system issues is publicly available and is checked for these positions from the "source", which are processed by the system ... It's all just a matter of time spent checking ... But in any case, the time checking for these positions without using this system is not big ... Here, for example, for bankruptcies and other cases considered by the Arbitration Courts, the time to check is a maximum of 10-15 minutes ... For other positions, a little more, but not " critical "...

 

[Роберт]

In principle, Robert, all this info that this system issues is publicly available and is checked for these positions from the "source", which are processed by the system ... It's all just a matter of time spent checking ... But in any case, the time checking for these positions without using this system is not big ... Here, for example, for bankruptcies and other cases considered by the Arbitration Courts, the time to check is a maximum of 10-15 minutes ... For other positions, a little more, but not " critical "...

I think you simplify the situation too much. The system processes information by dozens of search engines. This is a very powerful tool that allows you to pull information from the Internet that you can’t pull out in the usual way. He is therefore called invisible. And most importantly - this is the dynamics of changes to sites or access to Internet resources. This is most valuable. I now had a case when the most important information appeared about the sale of his property by one of the directors of firms. This allowed us to conclude that the people decided in 2014 to dump the country quietly. Do you think he will go without money? Especially when the Internet appeared infa about the expected license reviews of several dozen banks?
And last.
You are sorry, but the problems in your city may not be comparable to the problems in Moscow and St. Petersburg.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Robert))) The problems are not in the number of people in the village ... Problems in the methods of obtaining information ...: lol: There is information that allows you to draw any conclusions, but there is information that may not be needed (although sometimes and claimed) ... All in the sufficiency, or not sufficiency of information and its reliability ... If someone is interested to use this particular search and analytical system, no one bothers ... The only question is the cost and return on systems ... (why bear the costs, if you can do without them) .... And as for the invisibility of information, you just need to know where to get it ... And do not blindly trust various search engines ...

 

[Роберт]

Robert))) The problems are not in the number of people in the village ... Problems in the methods of obtaining information ...: lol: There is information that allows you to draw any conclusions, but there is information that may not be needed (although sometimes and claimed) ... All in the sufficiency, or not sufficiency of information and its reliability ... If someone is interested in using this particular search and analytical system, no one bothers ... The only question is the cost and return on systems ... (why bear the costs, if you can do without them) .... And as for the invisibility of information, you just need to know where to get it ... And do not blindly trust various search engines ...

I am writing this to your stubbornness. I’m not talking about the population in cities, but about the amount of money that goes there, about the interests of foreigners, politics, etc., which in your city, unfortunately, no one probably determines. Admissibility, sufficiency, other theoretical assumptions and knowledge of where I will not seek comment. Here is a finished product. People need quick solutions. So the question of the cost of its use excites me very much.
What kind of strange hint do you have of blindness? Do you think that colleagues discussing this problem are a little silly or something?

 

[Бедеров Игорь Сергеевич]

Now, I repeat, INTEGRUM is offered to colleagues for 60,000 a year. Accordingly, for 5 thousand per month. If for 5 people at least scatter - it is not at all expensive. I don’t need it so often, but I would fit in.

Ideally, I want it for free, but I also understand people, they need to be traded!