PRIVATE DETECTIVE. How not to make a mistake in choosing?

[Орлан]

Denis, excellent text, everything is clear, the main thing is chosen, without soap, I agree with my colleagues and, if possible, I will also post it on my site.

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Denis, excellent text, everything is clear, the main thing is chosen, without soap, I agree with my colleagues and, if possible, I will also post it on my site.

Thank you for rating! Once again: colleagues (on MOD), if I am submitting my personal article, then post it without problems and demand !!! The only request is for original articles to leave links to our website (YES State Advisor) and to MOD.

 

[Плотников Юрий Михайлович]

Denis, welcome! I liked the article, well done.
Respectfully...

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Denis, welcome! I liked the article, well done.
Respectfully...

And I greet you, Yur! Thank!

 

[ТИМУР]

Denis, thanks for the article, I read it with pleasure. Specifically, affordable, logical.

 

[Частный детектив Днепр]

The article is exactly in the "top ten"! Consistently, sensibly, briefly and most importantly - profitably. Thank you.

 

[dron]

The article can be described in just 2 words "DO NOT BELIEVE". The author gives examples without reinforcing them with anything or documents or links to Internet resources. Just PR for the sake of PR. The author gives an example that they helped some woman, and so what? In this example, he says that they were able to surpass a certain "private detective" who allegedly took an advance payment for the work and didn’t do it, and a little lower he writes that they themselves take an advance payment with pleasure. And where is the guarantee that they will sometimes do the work and do it with dignity? What this is expressed is not clear, and the author himself is modestly silent about it. For example, in my work I do not contact the prepaid system at all. We placed an order, received the first result (and you know that the first will be followed by more information) then ask for money from the customer, being absolutely sure that the work will be completed to the end. And so it turns out scam, fundraisers. But was there such a woman in general, that’s the question! When I am going to omit someone by belittling another, I usually have a document in my hands. For example, the customers of the examination are interested in whether my examination will take place in the courts - I show the verdicts of the courts in which this examination already appears as evidence. I also show a particular court ruling on a (purchased) polygraph examiner, my competitor, in which a judge speaks unflattering about his work. Moreover, he (this polygraph examiner) dumps at the cost of examination. But having these materials in hand, the customer can independently and objectively decide who to contact with the order. In this case, even if we assume that such a woman was in fact, a private detective is bound by a non-disclosure agreement about client information, so he simply cannot give this example!

 

[Евгений СБ]

The article can be described in just 2 words "DO NOT BELIEVE".

To believe or not to believe everyone’s business.
But everyone liked the article.
Maybe you dron need to look at it differently?

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

I could answer on points, but I won’t (thanks to the Conference and new personal contacts - this is also an experience that I personally had from the last event). I’ll tell a friend. It seems to me in this dron’s commentary that it is said quite clearly how close he is to private detective work. Plus a pronounced biased attitude, clearly speaking in the post. It seems to me that if a person is engaged in a specific profile, in this case it is a polygraph and a caligraph, then let him do it, why try to pass off his subjective opinion as true, especially without understanding the NPV issues. dron, I’m probably not going to be distracted by your statements, I will keep silent and go on calmly doing “scam and fundraising”.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

I could answer on points, but I won’t (thanks to the Conference and new personal contacts - this is also an experience that I personally had from the last event). I’ll tell a friend. It seems to me in this dron’s commentary that it is said quite clearly how close he is to private detective work. Plus a pronounced biased attitude, clearly speaking in the post. It seems to me that if a person is engaged in a specific profile, in this case it is a polygraph and a caligraph, then let him do it, why try to pass off his subjective opinion as true, especially without understanding the NPV issues. dron, I’m probably not going to be distracted by your statements, I will keep silent and go on calmly doing “scam and fundraising”.

Denis +++
And dronu advice after the phrase "I do not believe" change the nickname to Stanislavsky.
At one time, Denis expressed his opinion (and he is not alone), on your topic.
Now you, being not knowledgeable about NPV, are you trying to prove something? There is an opinion that you are deliberately shpying him and this is at least dumb, but at the maximum ...
Go about your business, especially since you have YOUR PAGE.