polygraph specialist

[dron]

Questions about theft and drugs did not come about by chance. We are doing screening. And screening is a lot of questions from different areas of risk. For managers, this set is optimal. For security guards, drivers, it will not work - other risks and other issues. We have only one goal - to camouflage the survey in a reliable way so that a person suspected of competitors does not understand that they are personally checking it. And gently, without strain, check whether this topic is relevant to him. But to use only this topic, not including others, is not possible according to the screening conditions. The option with the explanation, as I understand it, did not fit your situation. Selecting it as a control topic would have questions closer to the meaning and easier to understand. The style is designed in the spirit of screening, and not for pumping emotions, (in the case of a direct test) when writing an explanation.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

I don’t see a single moment that could interfere with the purity of the experiment — everything was done as the experts demanded .....

Was the radiation background at the time of the survey in line with the norm?

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

I don’t see a single moment that could interfere with the purity of the experiment — everything was done as the experts demanded .....

Was the radiation background at the time of the survey in line with the norm?

Yes of course! Only chemical ammunition exploded

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Some were noticeably nervous, but at the same time quotes (no offense to Andrei “Dron” - direct speech):
- ".... and who invented such illiterate stylistic questions?"

Igor, say that these are highly scientific technologies developed by British scientists.
For instance: "British scientists have found that a similar style of questions and tactics of their submission, provides the highest test result. The accuracy of the analysis with a similar style is from 98.56% to 99, 96%. Otherwise, the quality of the experiment may decrease up to 56.08% accuracy . "

 

[dron]

Dear "state adviser" and especially for those who want giggle On this subject I quote an excerpt from a very respected source. Alexander Soshnikov Alexander Pelenitsin "Personnel Assessment. Psychological and Psychophysiological Methods" M. Eskimo 2009 p122-123 "As you know, any method used to study a person, whether it is the diagnosis of some medical conditions or the determination of psychological qualities, in principle, cannot reach 100% accuracy and there is always some probability of error in conclusions drawn from the analysis of the data obtained ... ...... in principle, it is not right to pose the question of the accuracy of the method in general and to unequivocally state that this accuracy, for example, is 80% or 90%. false negative errors) and specificity (which determines the level of probability of a false positive error) are customizable, usually the decision on which error during testing on a polygraph is more preferable is taken individually in each case, taking into account the circumstances. " I’ll note on my own that the accuracy level using Caligra equipment is also a configurable quantity, it depends on many factors, almost all of which are related to the original material — manuscript. It is printed and any customer can see with what level of accuracy I give certain predictive conclusions. In addition, sometimes it happens that the initial sample is not made correctly, I ask you to redo it and indicate the reasons how and what needs to be fixed so that the program can correctly make the calculations.

 

[dron]

At the forecast level (which the program gives me) about 60% accuracy, I just ask you to redo the manuscript. And that's all, no one needs a scam. The program has an expert analysis function, due to which it is possible to slightly increase the prognostic conclusions, but as the saying goes, "you won’t make candy out of shit." And I am well aware of this.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Dear "state adviser" and especially for those who want giggle On this subject I quote an excerpt from a very respected source. Alexander Soshnikov Alexander Pelenitsin "Personnel Assessment. Psychological and Psychophysiological Methods" M. Eskimo 2009 p122-123 "As you know, any method used to study a person, whether it is the diagnosis of some medical conditions or the determination of psychological qualities, in principle, cannot reach 100% accuracy and there is always some probability of error in conclusions drawn from the analysis of the data obtained ... ...... in principle, it is not right to pose the question of the accuracy of the method in general and to unequivocally state that this accuracy, for example, is 80% or 90%. false negative errors) and specificity (which determines the level of probability of a false positive error) are customizable, usually the decision on which error during testing on a polygraph is more preferable is taken individually in each case, taking into account the circumstances. " I’ll note on my own that the accuracy level using Caligra equipment is also a configurable quantity, it depends on many factors, almost all of which are related to the original material — manuscript. It is printed and any customer can see with what level of accuracy I give certain predictive conclusions. In addition, sometimes it happens that the initial sample is not made correctly, I ask you to redo it and indicate the reasons how and what needs to be fixed so that the program can correctly make the calculations.

We’ll scan .... today, as promised, we’ll send ...... Andrei, I have an immodest question: but you gave a quote from “Alexander Soshnikov Alexander Pelenitsin” ..... I wonder which one of them gave the scientific labor WITHOUT HALF SIGNS OF EXPRESSION ???? !!!! .... We often make spelling mistakes, we are excusable .... and eminent authors can’t write like that .....

 

[dron]

And you are a pedant, but it’s good and simple to work with pedants, so long as they don’t get hung up on trifles, and at the same time see the main goal. : D

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

And you are a pedant, but it’s good and simple to work with pedants, so long as they don’t get hung up on trifles, and at the same time see the main goal. : D

So, Igor Nikolaevich!
Do you have more where to grow and it pleases, my friend ...

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

... and eminent authors do not write like that .....

Igor Nikolaevich, do you know another way ?? !! :? : shock:
: P: lol: