Theme for discussion ...

[Роберт]

I think that when discussing it is correct to proceed from the NPV law and from what actions the license was issued to the detective.

 

[Роберт]

Regarding work and my point of view on demand. I suspect that many colleagues simply do not want to admit to a lack of work. So it’s better to pretend that there is no end to customers. A business reputation does not suffer. By the way, high-quality detective services are extremely expensive, and they are not available to ordinary people with an income of 32,000 rubles a month. Because this income is enough for 2-3 days of the detective. About marketing in the activities of a detective. The market of detective services has never been so. Consequently, there is no marketing.

 

[Группа К]

Regarding work and my point of view on demand. I suspect that many colleagues simply do not want to admit to a lack of work. So it’s better to pretend that there is no end to customers. A business reputation does not suffer.

I propose to entrust the administration of the MOD to conduct a sociological study. We will compile a 2015 questionnaire where we ask each detective to note the number of cases, the types of investigations he conducted and the amount of the fee that he received for his work. Voluntary business

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Regarding work and my point of view on demand. I suspect that many colleagues simply do not want to admit to a lack of work. So it’s better to pretend that there is no end to customers. A business reputation does not suffer.

I propose to entrust the administration of the MOD to conduct a sociological study. We will compile a 2015 questionnaire where we ask each detective to note the number of cases, the types of investigations he conducted and the amount of the fee that he received for his work. Voluntary business

Interesting offer...))
Something we completely departed from the original topic.

 

[Роберт]

At one time, this question, about the questionnaire, was discussed. It seems in 2013?

 

[Роберт]

I’ll write my answers to the questionnaire. 2, collecting information for the statement of claim, organizing the security of a large financial structure, checking employees and partners. The amount of 500,000, of which the costs of performing the work were paid. The execution of these works took 5 months. I ask you to congratulate me on the initiative. Like the first one who answered. I ask my colleagues to continue.

 

[Группа К]

I’ll write my answers to the questionnaire. 2, collecting information for the statement of claim, organizing the security of a large financial structure, checking employees and partners. The amount of 500,000, of which the costs of performing the work were paid. The execution of these works took 5 months. I ask you to congratulate me on the initiative. Like the first one who answered. I ask my colleagues to continue.

Robert, thank you for supporting my initiative Honestly, I didn’t think that someone would be interested in my proposal: roll: and even got a little tense: cry: I did not serve in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but I suppose that the investigators regularly report to the statistical authorities about his work. Perhaps their report form can be slightly modified and laid out for the general viewing of detectives.

By the way, I, as a member of the SRO Sudexpertov, I can add that the members of the SRO every three years are required to provide two expert opinions. This is to confirm their practical work. Otherwise, the expert must again take a training course (60 thousand rubles) and pass the exam. In my opinion, if you open a special branch in the MOD, where each member will regularly upload their own statistics, this will be only useful. If only because before entering into a discussion with a colleague, the detective will have a clear understanding of how much his opponent is competent in the practice of private investigation, and not in theory.

 

[Роберт]

Well, you can always lie. Nobody will check.

 

[Роберт]

I’ll write my answers to the questionnaire. 2, collecting information for the statement of claim, organizing the security of a large financial structure, checking employees and partners. The amount of 500,000, of which the costs of performing the work were paid. The execution of these works took 5 months. I ask you to congratulate me on the initiative. Like the first one who answered. I ask my colleagues to continue.

Robert, thank you for supporting my initiative Honestly, I didn’t think that someone would be interested in my proposal: roll: and even got a little tense: cry: I did not serve in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but I suppose that the investigators regularly report to the statistical authorities about his work. Perhaps their report form can be slightly modified and laid out for the general viewing of detectives.

By the way, I, as a member of the SRO Sudexpertov, I can add that the members of the SRO every three years are required to provide two expert opinions. This is to confirm their practical work. Otherwise, the expert must again take a training course (60 thousand rubles) and pass the exam. In my opinion, if you open a special branch in the MOD, where each member will regularly upload their own statistics, this will be only useful. If only because before entering into a discussion with a colleague, the detective will have a clear understanding of how much his opponent is competent in the practice of private investigation, and not in theory.

You see how interesting! Didn’t you answer your questions yourself? Personally, I doubt that someone else will answer. And forget about the profile. Useless. This has already been discussed a few years ago. But I will draw a conclusion from this. Since there is nothing to brag about, then there is no work.

 

[Группа К]

I’ll write my answers to the questionnaire. 2, collecting information for the statement of claim, organizing the security of a large financial structure, checking employees and partners. The amount of 500,000, of which the costs of performing the work were paid. The execution of these works took 5 months. I ask you to congratulate me on the initiative. Like the first one who answered. I ask my colleagues to continue.

Robert, thank you for supporting my initiative Honestly, I didn’t think that someone would be interested in my proposal: roll: and even got a little tense: cry: I did not serve in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but I suppose that the investigators regularly report to the statistical authorities about his work. Perhaps their report form can be slightly modified and laid out for the general viewing of detectives.

By the way, I, as a member of the SRO Sudexpertov, I can add that the members of the SRO every three years are required to provide two expert opinions. This is to confirm their practical work. Otherwise, the expert must again take a training course (60 thousand rubles) and pass the exam. In my opinion, if you open a special branch in the MOD, where each member will regularly upload their own statistics, this will be only useful. If only because before entering into a discussion with a colleague, the detective will have a clear understanding of how much his opponent is competent in the practice of private investigation, and not in theory.

You see how interesting! Didn’t you answer your questions yourself? Personally, I doubt that someone else will answer. And forget about the profile. Useless. This has already been discussed a few years ago. But I will draw a conclusion from this. Since there is nothing to brag about, then there is no work.

Why so? It would be strange if I started this procedure, I didn’t have what to answer: D There are cases and there are many of them. Search for defendants, Interviews (survey on record), Identification of individuals and legal entities, Search for anonymous, domain name owners, Search for companies and warehouses, Test purchases, etc., etc.
I can even give references to arbitration for 2015, in which the court accepted my evidence as evidence:
Case No. A40-60566 / 15
Case No. A40-23705 / 15
Case No. A58-1533 / 2015

Simply, if each of us will "represent" our business in this way - then what's the point? Inconvenient, uninformative. Therefore, I propose to draw up a reporting form. For convenience and visibility.