Competitive intelligence in the Premier League business

[JR Security Consulting Group]

Robert! But in fact, the person himself calling himself a detective, and working according to the law of NPV, must clearly know and determine what is possible and what is not? And what advantages do I have, as a detective, over other specialized specialists ?! I think I need to know my advantages? Or not?
But just not the way many think, contact with relevant questions, we will consider and think, or maybe even take it, and maybe we will achieve a result,

Or maybe we just rest on the differences in the laws of different countries?

In Russia, it seems to me, the Ministry of Internal Affairs simply placed its potential competitors in obviously unbearable conditions. When to work fully according to the law is possible only in a limited range of issues - such as compiling certificates for the enterprise. Hence the increased secrecy of a number of participants - who cannot talk about what they are doing, because a priori this can be perceived incorrectly by regulatory authorities. Well, or not wrong, but negative.

In other countries, the BH law may not exist at all. And thirdly, it’s normal.

And then, in fact, we have the common name "Private Detective", but fundamentally different opportunities for work.

So maybe?

but it’s better to contact us, because there is a license, but ..... it doesn’t exist, don’t ask him, it works illegally, and in general, if there is no license, he ...... is not a professional, etc. rave.

That is yes. This is really nonsense. Because it is impossible to work outside the law - any work of a registered company is automatically regulated by the Civil Code, at a minimum.
Well, some people don’t even suspect that for qualified work of the prognostic type it is necessary to understand the subject of the study.

Probably it can, because the laws are different. But the base is probably one, and they are written with a carbon copy (my opinion). And where there is no law, the detective is based on the Civil Law, in any case it should, and his hands are untied ...? Compared to those who work under the BH law ... I wondered. We have to study the law on NPV in Latvia.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

The question is for you, as a person who understands, but for x ... all this is necessary, then, a license, registration, such as cooperation and other crap? If you can do all this without calling yourself a detective, and writing down other codes and field of activity in other words when registering an enterprise, ??? Or are there still advantages for the sake of which the masses of respected people are struggling in disputes?
I do not belittle the activities of my esteemed colleagues in any way, but I’ve been hooked, and I want to understand, but with reasoned and justified reason, without personal disputes.

I am now gathering opinions on Facebook, LJ and in some specialized forums in order to understand this. Because I have exactly the same question.
A lawyer or journalist seems to have more rights than a detective. And if it is difficult to become a lawyer, then a journalist is as easy as shelling pears.

So far it seems to me that, in addition to certificates to enterprises - that is, practically "white" work, detectives are also engaged in establishing the place of residence of people ("gray" activity, let’s say so), as well as various types of "outdoor", which they try to pass off as - Something else (in fact, "black" activity). And then the status of a detective allows you to advertise and thereby try to attract customers.
But this is an intermediate result of my survey. The final may be different.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

And where there is no law, the detective is based on the Civil Law, in any case it should, and his hands are untied ...? Compared to those who work under the BH law ... I wondered.

Theoretically, so. True, in addition to relying on the Civil Law, there are also limiters in the form of criminal. But nonetheless.

We have to study the law on NPV in Latvia.

Tell me later, please. I'm interested too.

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

So we come to the main issue that interests us, but why ??? We will collect the opinion of the pros and post it here, I think we will be surprised

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

This is not a call, does not become a detective story, it is just a way to understand. Maybe I need a license too, but I don’t see any benefits yet Just a debriefing, let's say.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

I have another impression.

BH is basically “imprisoned” for working on people, so to speak, in everyday life. Those. - where he went, with whom he met, where he sleeps, how much he spends, and so on. He has almost no focus on business interests. Perhaps, by the way, here comes the misunderstanding of many things for a number of participants in the discussion. This was not in their practice - and they do not believe that it is not just there, but a whole world.

And yet, BHs are "ground" on security. Are you scammers? "Do they break any laws?" Etc. Something like Security Services outsourcing. But the Security Council, which has a strong inclination towards prohibitive functions - because BH is not familiar with the business of the company, and the Security Council lowers its tasks to him, narrow and, as a rule, such that she is reluctant or has no time to do it.

Correct me if I say something wrong.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

This is not a call, does not become a detective story, it is just a way to understand. Maybe I need a license too, but I don’t see any benefits yet Just a debriefing, let's say.

+1
And yet, an understanding of the points of common ground. That is ... when it's better to call a detective, and when it's better not to.

 

[Роберт]

I think my opinion is very clear. And my opinion about our state is also very clear.

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

This is not a call, does not become a detective story, it is just a way to understand. Maybe I need a license too, but I don’t see any benefits yet Just a debriefing, let's say.

+1
And yet, an understanding of the points of common ground. That is .. when it is better to call a detective, and when it is better not to. [/ Quote]
Absolutely right !

 

[Роберт]

I have another impression.

BH is basically “imprisoned” for working on people, so to speak, in everyday life. Those. - where he went, with whom he met, where he sleeps, how much he spends, and so on. He has almost no focus on business interests. Perhaps, by the way, here comes the misunderstanding of many things for a number of participants in the discussion. This was not in their practice - and they do not believe that it is not just there, but a whole world.

And yet, BHs are "ground" on security. Are you scammers? "Do they break any laws?" Etc. Something like Security Services outsourcing. But the Security Council, which has a strong inclination towards prohibitive functions - because BH is not familiar with the business of the company, and the Security Council lowers its tasks to him, narrow and, as a rule, such that she is reluctant or has no time to do it.

Correct me if I say something wrong.

Look, I have a license on the main page of the site, click it, it says what the detective can do. To everyone else, only if he is hired by a labor contract as an employee of the company. And in the SB, and in marketing, anywhere, the law does not prohibit.