OD AntiDoghanter

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

Detective agency. DASC. Ukraine, Russia.
Thank you for your advice, we have representatives in all major forums of government bodies
If your point of view is different from ours, this is not the basis for sarcasm))
Although you, as a businessman (I suppose), should understand that this is a new market.

The fact that there is a share in this for the possible attraction of customers, I certainly see. Honestly, it’s a certain part of the moral issue that confuses me in your work - and more specifically, I’m not sure how much you and your followers clearly share the person’s aggression towards the stray dog that is “quieter than water and lower than grass” and the individuals that I described in previous posts - aggressive and dangerous to humans (including children, women - who have practically no chance to win in the battle with the four-legged predator).

 

[Евгений СБ]

Naturally, we will not announce the lists, I am sure that the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB and other services have similar information. Why you need it, you can only guess.
For example, I would be interested to know that a flayer lives in my house. And I'm afraid that you are greatly exaggerating the abilities of these structures, at present. I would like to be mistaken.

2. Pedophiles, drug dealers, rapists and many other criminals, based on your logic, do not make you want to pick up a weapon, and looking at a tiny fraction of the victims of dog aggression, you consider it logical to go kill all dogs, cats and birds. For instance.
Personally, it doesn’t. I have only one desire for these non-humans to be isolated for life from a normal society. And you can safely gather a group of like-minded kamikaze and purify our society from filthy methods. If these earhooks make you want to get rid of them.

To gouge out a kitten’s eyes, break his bones, peel his skin alive while filming this on camera is an act of saving people from animal aggression?
Animals are more often responsible for the manifestation of aggression than humans, moreover, with their life, and even when the person himself was the aggressor, and the animal only defended itself.
You apparently did not read my first post carefully. I wrote in it: Of course, I do not in any way support those who, in a sadistic way, get pleasure from killing and mutilating homeless animals. And even for being held accountable.

And I would like to hear who authorized you and guided by what, do you carry out your activities?
I answer: Article 30 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the FEDERAL LAW "On Public Associations", the Federal Law "On Non-Profit Organizations", the Federal Law "On Non-Profit Organizations", etc.
These laws do not give you the legal right to collect information about individuals. Please do not violate the Laws. Failure to comply leads to liability.

A stray animal cannot be deemed to have no owner until it is established.
A good owner will put a collar on his pet and will walk on a leash.
Situations are different, violation of the rules of detention - does not deprive the right of ownership. And where does the argument about the good and unscrupulous owners))
Despite the fact that since animal property, then you need to monitor it, and not scatter anywhere. Then you do not have to write statements and file claims.

Show me the one who never breaks anything ... [/i]
Do you want to admit to breaking the law?
And you, probably, cross the road only along the zebra and under the green traffic light, never in your life have you thrown a candy wrapper past the ballot box, you have never expressed obscenities ???
List to continue? You are our law-abiding. If you wish, you can turn the situation around this way: Your appearance on this forum is due to the fact that you want to involve the detectives present here in your criminal scheme for illegally collecting information on the people you are interested in.

You can always ask for advice. I think here you will not be denied this.

 

[ДНК2012]

that's how a different rabble is attached to the detective movement ..... and someone, for the sake of their ratings, supports it ..... I can’t even imagine that WIN, WAD .... ARD, they accepted different dubious organizations .... however - this is another story ...

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

"In our life, everything happens ............ and under the sun the snow does not melt ............": lol:

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

I can’t say that the situation is developing exactly according to the model of the personal page of the Drone, but there are parallels ...

 

[Симферополь]

Friends! If people come together to counter the spread of sadism - I think this is a priori, there is nothing wrong ... In addition, do not forget: "The dog is a friend of man!" And, if we, in some posts, advocate for the right, then the issue should be resolved by legal methods. The collection of personal data on violators of the law for transmission to law enforcement agencies can hardly be called illegal. Everyone in the services probably has a "collection of data about the person" (of course, with his (his) consent) After that, you can suspect the detective community of some hypocrisy. In the ADH posts, for example, I found only one alarming contradiction ... That this is their movement is an exclusively voluntary movement of like-minded people, but at the same time in another commentary this is a “new market" (! ??). It’s not entirely clear ... I would like to hear clarifications from the author.
Be that as it may, for me personally, anti-HH is much closer than HH. Maybe someone and vice versa. Maybe someone bit the dog in childhood and he still remembers it. In any case, in the comments of colleagues you can see something personal between the lines ... But this is not a reason to poison rat poison, shoot, cut and slaughter other animals, as well as sympathize with those who trap it. Two-legged subjects (you can’t name such people), engaged in this vile craft, also put their art on the web, and this is a clear propaganda of the cult of violence and cruelty.
Think about it: from primitive times DOG helped the biped humanoid creature to become a HUMAN! Is now the DOG against his will will help a person to become just TWO ??!
And finally, how do you think the classics would comment on this topic: Pushkin, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky?
We are PEOPLE! And let's not forget that.
Respectfully to all participants in the discussion, Andrey. Crimea.

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

We are PEOPLE! And let's not forget that.
Respectfully to all participants in the discussion, Andrey. Crimea.

:!::!::!: Respect!

 

[Игорь Эдуардович]

A small remark. At the end of January 2012, in the industrial zone of Riga, a woman’s corpse, 70 years old, was found. (She worked as a janitor). Examination established that the death came from an attack by a pack of dogs (it’s better not to look at the faint of heart). Industrial facilities and a receiver were nearby for stray dogs ... An investigation is underway. Here's what happens if you don't control the pack of dogs.

 

[antidoghanter]

Perhaps long posts, I did not freely confuse you.
The phenomenon of doghunting in all its manifestations is not new; from the brand new in it is the doghunter,
organization in a certain community with its own system of distribution of roles, group management, briefing and coordination of actions.
Everything else is described in criminal psychology, caring for children, protecting citizens from aggression, nothing more than a trick of this group, the only thing that one of them still keeps from attacks on people is fear (and there are also cases of attacks on people). Everything else, the classical scheme, now animals, tomorrow people.

Regarding the analysis and obtaining information, we do not go beyond the framework of legal norms.
Your speculation about criminal schemes for collecting information for public authorities is absurd.

A new market for activity, I mean for detectives, because - this is an opportunity for private detectives to help protect the rights of victims, ensure security, prevent the commission of a crime, etc. in this case, from criminal acts and intentions, the so-called doghunters.

Regarding my personal law-abiding behavior)) - yes, I respect the law, and the honor of the uniform, is also not tarnished.

I almost forgot about our structures supporting order and statehood.
A small example, the main site of the doghunters [DLMURL] https://vreditelyam.net/ [/ DLMURL] is blocked, like most doghunter accounts in YouTube and a number of social networks.
Some information on attracting participants to this resource has already been published by authorities.
If the work of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB and other structures is not advertised, this does not mean that it does not exist.

Also, young people began to learn to work in the right way, http: //legallyredlady.livejournal.com/100596.html there are mistakes, but the principle of work is correct.

 

[Елена Алмазова]

Good day, let me speak out as a person with 18 years of experience in the field of dog science, as the owner of dogs of serious breeds that haven’t bitten anyone in their entire lives, and as a citizen of the Russian Federation, who, you know, crosses the street along the zebra and only green light, sales if there are no cars at all. Well, I have such a habit since childhood. So here. I carefully read the prefix under the topic. I support ADH. And not because I love dogs, but because really dogs are just a cover. For some reason, when a flock appeared in the courtyard, near our office ... the tenants did not send them to hunt and shoot, to write formidable slogans for those who have animals, they simply called for a catch service and the problem was solved overnight. And here, people dress in camouflage, masks, or with smirks in the camera they put a sausage with poison, which gives an excruciating death to animals that the whole yard is not afraid of (notice, DO NOT BE AFRAID), but feeds, makes booths, takes care. Probably, it's not about life.
Moreover, now in the State Duma lies the Bill on Responsible Handling of Animals, which is rumored to be being labeled by Mars. I will not go into politics, this is not my business. But the point is that as soon as this bill appears on TV, information about torn people does not come down, I can argue, in 90 cases, it is either a lie or something else that is not clean. Guys, well, I don’t believe it when the boy shows a point on his leg, and says that his staff wanted to kill “SIMPLY SO”. I have stuff. If he wanted to kill the kid, he would be already dead, believe me. I bet that as soon as the law is passed on July 1, 2012, if I’m not mistaken, on our television, the dogs will suddenly stop (Oh, miracle!) Tearing people up.
And finally, a little about stray dogs, maybe this will help you or your loved ones, neighbors: Do not feed the homeless dogs if you are not going to pick them up or attach them to the owner's hands. I will explain why. There is such a notion of a prairie dog, it was once domestic dogs, or simply tamed by a man who went wild, created a flock and left the village (!) They go to fields, forests and live hunting, far from people. And due to the fact that they are fed, they remain in our yards, and then protecting the territory, they attack the weak: small children, women ...
Sorry to write a lot, thank you for your attention.